Viewing profile — danielmartins
danielmartins
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 23, 2013, 1:50 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 69
- Public activity
- 36 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About danielmartins
GitHub: https://github.com/danielfm
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48114665
Judging by the poor hardware quality of some Google Pixel generations, I'm not putting my money anywhere near this thing. Edit: spelling
-
comment
Comment #47048516
I had a Pixel 6a with Graphene OS for a year before the phone started to glitch and eventually die. It ran pretty hot; sometimes it was hard to even hold the phone in my hands with…
- story
-
comment
Comment #46625816
Here’s mine! https://danielfm.me After years of neglect, I updated the theme, translated all pages to Portuguese and finally posted something new. I hope to continue this and maybe…
- story
-
comment
Comment #42521991
Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #42521373
Looks awesome, amazing work! Any particular/strong reason for choosing Zig for this?
- story
-
comment
Comment #17240972
Not as generally available as I thought, and for the looks of it, feels just as "hacky" as the preview with respect to the user experience. For some reason, I was expecting more fr…
-
comment
Comment #15244437
You can annotate any Service of type LoadBalancer in order to configure various aspects[1] of the associated ELB, including which ACM-managed certificate you want to attach to each…
-
comment
Comment #15242519
> This is not true, if you run Debian / CentOS7 / Ubuntu, out of the box the settings are good. The thing you don't want to do is start to modify the network stack by reading rando…
-
comment
Comment #15242351
> TLS termination at the Ingress Controller and by default unencrypted from there to the service endpoint? We are doing TLS termination at the ELB (we're running on AWS). > Interes…
-
comment
Comment #15242151
No. By default, the NGINX ingress controller routes traffic directly to pod IPs (the Service endpoints): https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/tree/master/controller...
-
comment
Comment #15240865
> Why would any sane Op/Inf/SRE choose not to have at least account-level isolation - is it only a matter of cost due to under-utilization? In our particular case, yes, pretty much…
-
comment
Comment #15240860
> This is a great read. I know the single cluster for all env is something that is sort of popular but it's always made me uncomfortable for the reasons stated in the article but a…
-
comment
Comment #15239084
> Could you share which version of NGINX you found the issue with the reloads? Which version the fix was released? I'm using 0.9.0-beta.13. I first reported this issue in a NGINX i…
-
comment
Comment #15238999
> OP didn't mention what Linux distro he's using and what are all of the OS-level configs he changed in the end of the day. I'm using Container Linux, and yes, I did a few modifica…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14184095
Nice article. You said you are using this toy cluster to play around with monitoring as well, so could you share more details in that area, for instance: - How much resources does …
- story
-
comment
Comment #12522633
No, these 'development' environments point to other services in 'staging'.
-
comment
Comment #12513524
We currently only run stateless apps on Kubernetes. All databases are hosted elsewhere (RDS, MongoDB Cloud, etc)
-
comment
Comment #12505341
It' not open source, but I'll try to sell the idea to our CTO. :) Just to give you more details about its inner workings, this function is written in JavaScript that gets called wh…
-
comment
Comment #12505300
There's no problem in sticking with your current solution if it's working for you.