Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — danielmartins

danielmartins

HN member
Joined
Mon, Dec 23, 2013, 1:50 PM UTC
HN karma
69
Public activity
36 items

About danielmartins

Blog: https://danielfm.me

GitHub: https://github.com/danielfm

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48114665

    Judging by the poor hardware quality of some Google Pixel generations, I'm not putting my money anywhere near this thing. Edit: spelling

  2. comment
    Comment #47048516

    I had a Pixel 6a with Graphene OS for a year before the phone started to glitch and eventually die. It ran pretty hot; sometimes it was hard to even hold the phone in my hands with…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #46625816

    Here’s mine! https://danielfm.me After years of neglect, I updated the theme, translated all pages to Portuguese and finally posted something new. I hope to continue this and maybe…

  5. story
  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #42521373

    Looks awesome, amazing work! Any particular/strong reason for choosing Zig for this?

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #17240972

    Not as generally available as I thought, and for the looks of it, feels just as "hacky" as the preview with respect to the user experience. For some reason, I was expecting more fr…

  10. comment
    Comment #15244437

    You can annotate any Service of type LoadBalancer in order to configure various aspects[1] of the associated ELB, including which ACM-managed certificate you want to attach to each…

  11. comment
    Comment #15242519

    > This is not true, if you run Debian / CentOS7 / Ubuntu, out of the box the settings are good. The thing you don't want to do is start to modify the network stack by reading rando…

  12. comment
    Comment #15242351

    > TLS termination at the Ingress Controller and by default unencrypted from there to the service endpoint? We are doing TLS termination at the ELB (we're running on AWS). > Interes…

  13. comment
    Comment #15242151

    No. By default, the NGINX ingress controller routes traffic directly to pod IPs (the Service endpoints): https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/tree/master/controller...

  14. comment
    Comment #15240865

    > Why would any sane Op/Inf/SRE choose not to have at least account-level isolation - is it only a matter of cost due to under-utilization? In our particular case, yes, pretty much…

  15. comment
    Comment #15240860

    > This is a great read. I know the single cluster for all env is something that is sort of popular but it's always made me uncomfortable for the reasons stated in the article but a…

  16. comment
    Comment #15239084

    > Could you share which version of NGINX you found the issue with the reloads? Which version the fix was released? I'm using 0.9.0-beta.13. I first reported this issue in a NGINX i…

  17. comment
    Comment #15238999

    > OP didn't mention what Linux distro he's using and what are all of the OS-level configs he changed in the end of the day. I'm using Container Linux, and yes, I did a few modifica…

  18. story
  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #14184095

    Nice article. You said you are using this toy cluster to play around with monitoring as well, so could you share more details in that area, for instance: - How much resources does …

  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #12522633

    No, these 'development' environments point to other services in 'staging'.

  23. comment
    Comment #12513524

    We currently only run stateless apps on Kubernetes. All databases are hosted elsewhere (RDS, MongoDB Cloud, etc)

  24. comment
    Comment #12505341

    It' not open source, but I'll try to sell the idea to our CTO. :) Just to give you more details about its inner workings, this function is written in JavaScript that gets called wh…

  25. comment
    Comment #12505300

    There's no problem in sticking with your current solution if it's working for you.