Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dangisafascist

dangisafascist

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 08, 2017, 5:39 PM UTC
HN karma
-2
Public activity
17 items

About dangisafascist

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14750635

    1st one is the fastest in Cpython and causes the least mallocs. Ultimately not sure what the criterion for best is here

  2. comment
    Comment #14750240

    Hackers solve challenging problems whose solutions are not clear. This is not a challenging problem, and the solution was obvious. This is not an example of curiosity being explore…

  3. comment
    Comment #14746460

    This solution isn't ideal because it requires multiple internet facing IPs. It's fine for a private network. SRV records are the right solution. There needs to be more advocacy for…

  4. comment
    Comment #14742772

    I like bootstrapping but I don't believe in coasting on a lifestyle business or anything similar to what DHH promotes (which I view as mediocrity).

  5. comment
    Comment #14742764

    Hey man I read your profile and you sound wise (according to my pre-existing biases). Just curious, what API/platform do you use for your trading bots?

  6. comment
    Comment #14740438

    IPOs are by definition "wealth transfers" from investors to business owners.

  7. comment
    Comment #14734469

    Saying Silicon Valley is dead is like saying the earth is dead. Saying Silicon Valley is in trouble is like saying the earth is in trouble. It's just irrational agenda-oriented FUD…

  8. story
    Ask HN: What percentage of HN users are entrepreneurs?

    Reading the comments it seems like not many people here are entreprenuerially-minded. What do others think?

  9. comment
    Comment #14732388

    Sure but how common is that case? How common are multi-tenant Linux systems with untrusted users that give those specific permissions? Do you want untrusted users sniffing the pack…

  10. comment
    Comment #14730360

    The bpf() system call and SOCK_RAW both require root. Is there an example of using bpf that doesn't require root?

  11. comment
    Comment #14727993

    For experimentation and testing, a kernel module for each rule doesn't seem unworkable. Just hide all the details behind a nice tool. For production, placing all rules in a single …

  12. comment
    Comment #14727759

    If you write your kernel module in eBPF (by pre-compiling to native code) it can't crash either.

  13. comment
    Comment #14727754

    I'm not arguing against eBPF the language. It's safety guarantees make sense to me. I'm arguing against the in-kernel eBPF infrastructure: bpf system call, the JIT and the VM. I th…

  14. comment
    Comment #14726511

    I can but I don't see why that is necessary. It's plain to see that it's possible and performs better in production since it avoids the JIT step. https://github.com/tsgates/rust.ko…

  15. comment
    Comment #14726451

    I'm not sure this argument makes sense. Avoiding accidentally crashing the kernel doesn't require a BPF layer. For instance, you could just write your kernel module in a sufficient…

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #14726311

    I'm confused why BPF exists in the first place. Can't we just compile kernel modules that hook into the tracing infrastructure? It seems like a webassembly for the kernel but local…