Viewing profile — danghica
danghica
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 11, 2015, 12:24 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 155
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About danghica
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20206186
So there were three deaths for who knows how many rides. How does this compare with bikes and cars? Surely some people die using those or any other means of transport, including wa…
-
comment
Comment #20189835
Yes, and this means that you do have far bigger problems than keeping track of drug trials.
-
comment
Comment #20188654
Why not a government regulated database?
-
comment
Comment #16566664
Hello all, I am the author of the blog post. Now the tool is available online: https://fyp.jackhughesweb.com/tasks/ Please fill out the feedback form if you have time, so we can im…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #10505191
There is absolutely no irony. Extreme inequality is undesirable on any scale. This is consistency, the opposite of irony.
-
comment
Comment #10505068
You seem to assume that extreme inequality in society is to be fought against only if it leads to an overall degradation of material prosperity. That is nonsense. People always wan…
-
comment
Comment #10319980
Indeed. Agda and Coq are excellent examples.
- story
-
comment
Comment #10148899
Yes, of course. But that is not the point at stake here.
-
comment
Comment #10148773
If "everything computes" then you can not use "because it computes" as an explanation.
-
comment
Comment #10148716
Yes, but they merely spell out Chalmers's implementation relation without even acknowledging it properly: "The question of when a physical system is computing is fundamentally a qu…
-
comment
Comment #10148700
I suppose you refer to section 6 in his paper which attacks a particular critique of computationalism. I think the particular point he is making is valid. However, the argument thi…
-
comment
Comment #9734751
Pied Piper?
- story
-
comment
Comment #9684641
You would still need to program in Agda though :) Cheers!
-
comment
Comment #9684632
Indeed, I was going to talk about session types in a follow-on post :) Well anticipated! Cheers!
-
comment
Comment #9680951
I agree with monads, not so sure about algebraic effects. Having to define the effect feels like "simulation" to me. It's OK for a meta-language, but to me it feels wrong for actua…
-
comment
Comment #9678950
I am aware of this -- I teach Agda :) But I think Agda is not quite as accessible as Python, that's what I meant. Cheers!
- story
-
comment
Comment #9560810
In fact, by considering diagrams left as exercise you will learn even more! :)
-
comment
Comment #9560802
Site promptly collapsed. I'll need to have a word with admins. Meanwhile, here's a link to a text-only cached version: http://bit.ly/1dbgW1J
-
comment
Comment #9526134
Yes!