Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — danghica

danghica

HN member
Joined
Mon, May 11, 2015, 12:24 PM UTC
HN karma
155
Public activity
28 items

About danghica

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #20206186

    So there were three deaths for who knows how many rides. How does this compare with bikes and cars? Surely some people die using those or any other means of transport, including wa…

  2. comment
    Comment #20189835

    Yes, and this means that you do have far bigger problems than keeping track of drug trials.

  3. comment
    Comment #20188654

    Why not a government regulated database?

  4. comment
    Comment #16566664

    Hello all, I am the author of the blog post. Now the tool is available online: https://fyp.jackhughesweb.com/tasks/ Please fill out the feedback form if you have time, so we can im…

  5. story
  6. story
  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #10505191

    There is absolutely no irony. Extreme inequality is undesirable on any scale. This is consistency, the opposite of irony.

  9. comment
    Comment #10505068

    You seem to assume that extreme inequality in society is to be fought against only if it leads to an overall degradation of material prosperity. That is nonsense. People always wan…

  10. comment
    Comment #10319980

    Indeed. Agda and Coq are excellent examples.

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #10148899

    Yes, of course. But that is not the point at stake here.

  13. comment
    Comment #10148773

    If "everything computes" then you can not use "because it computes" as an explanation.

  14. comment
    Comment #10148716

    Yes, but they merely spell out Chalmers's implementation relation without even acknowledging it properly: "The question of when a physical system is computing is fundamentally a qu…

  15. comment
    Comment #10148700

    I suppose you refer to section 6 in his paper which attacks a particular critique of computationalism. I think the particular point he is making is valid. However, the argument thi…

  16. comment
    Comment #9734751

    Pied Piper?

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #9684641

    You would still need to program in Agda though :) Cheers!

  19. comment
    Comment #9684632

    Indeed, I was going to talk about session types in a follow-on post :) Well anticipated! Cheers!

  20. comment
    Comment #9680951

    I agree with monads, not so sure about algebraic effects. Having to define the effect feels like "simulation" to me. It's OK for a meta-language, but to me it feels wrong for actua…

  21. comment
    Comment #9678950

    I am aware of this -- I teach Agda :) But I think Agda is not quite as accessible as Python, that's what I meant. Cheers!

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #9560810

    In fact, by considering diagrams left as exercise you will learn even more! :)

  24. comment
    Comment #9560802

    Site promptly collapsed. I'll need to have a word with admins. Meanwhile, here's a link to a text-only cached version: http://bit.ly/1dbgW1J

  25. comment