Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — danfuzz

danfuzz

HN member
Joined
Wed, Oct 13, 2010, 12:31 AM UTC
HN karma
49
Public activity
33 items

About danfuzz

Virtual machinist, most well known for having designed the Dalvik VM and related .dex executable file format, as part of the Android team at Google.

Personal site:

Github:

StackOverflow:

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41097038

    I look forward to you reviewing your HN contributions in a decade or so.

  2. comment
    Comment #41083660

    You're probably thinking of Prop 13, which, no argument. But I don't think the fix is as straightforward as you imply. (TLDR the biggest problems are due to corporate landowners, n…

  3. comment
    Comment #41083644

    Near as I can tell, the domain isn't "highly-in-demand" in any meaningful way. I think the whiners who carp about its current use are just crypto-jealous.

  4. comment
    Comment #41057251

    At least where I live (California US), that's not true. There are certain things which trigger a change in taxable value, but they're mostly only indirectly connected to appraised …

  5. comment
    Comment #41057183

    Just to be clear, do you believe milk.com is being squatted on right now? Should its registrant morally pay more than the default annual registration cost? If so: How does consiste…

  6. comment
    Comment #41052839

    People pay registration fees every year for domains. How is what you propose different than registrars setting different fees for different domains? Or: What entity should be entit…

  7. comment
    Comment #41048889

    Are you proposing every domain name registrant pay for an annual appraisal, whether or not they are planning on selling?

  8. comment
    Comment #41048854

    I know of no truly serious offers for the domain, but why should that matter? I'm pretty sure residences aren't taxed based on un-accepted offers, for example.

  9. comment
    Comment #41043003

    How would you calculate the FMV of milk.com?

  10. comment
    Comment #41042680

    I don't think he wants offers?

  11. comment
    Comment #41042667

    In what way is he actually speculating or rent seeking? He has a real website on it — not just a placeholder — and he's got DNS MX records, so it's presumably actively used for ema…

  12. comment
    Comment #41042626

    This is also my take.

  13. comment
    Comment #23623030

    Pretty sure the main answer is that he's not actually engaging in rent-seeking in any pejorative sense.

  14. comment
    Comment #23605234

    Apple doesn't in fact have a blanket trademark on the word "apple."

  15. comment
    Comment #23595145

    FWIW I don't think he actually ever intends to or expects to sell.

  16. comment
    Comment #23595059

    My read on his "value" page is that he doesn't actually want to sell. Assuming he just wants to keep using the domain for his personal site and have the same email address he's had…

  17. comment
    Comment #23594857

    I didn't ask for a definition. In what way does that apply to milk.com? Is the owner seeking to get wealthy from it? And if so, is he also somehow failing to create sufficient weal…

  18. comment
    Comment #23592884

    What "rent" is he seeking?

  19. comment
    Comment #23592872

    His brand is strong, perhaps.

  20. comment
    Comment #23592748

    In what way is this site "squatting?" I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure you can't get a trademark on simple English words like "milk."

  21. comment
    Comment #19444415

    I also wouldn't buy milk.com for $2000. Does that mean I should sell it for $2000? In any case, there is also a time / hassle reason to not sell: It would mean the loss of the only…

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #19442395

    I mean, I really would sell for $10MM. But I think I'd be giving someone a real steal for (much) less. Like, sure, I could use $100,000, but does that mean I should sell a more-val…

  24. comment
    Comment #19442283

    For me too. Yes I am fortunate in multiple regards.

  25. comment
    Comment #19441569

    I'm here for you.