Viewing profile — danfuzz
danfuzz
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 13, 2010, 12:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 49
- Public activity
- 33 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About danfuzz
Personal site:
Github:
StackOverflow:
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41097038
I look forward to you reviewing your HN contributions in a decade or so.
-
comment
Comment #41083660
You're probably thinking of Prop 13, which, no argument. But I don't think the fix is as straightforward as you imply. (TLDR the biggest problems are due to corporate landowners, n…
-
comment
Comment #41083644
Near as I can tell, the domain isn't "highly-in-demand" in any meaningful way. I think the whiners who carp about its current use are just crypto-jealous.
-
comment
Comment #41057251
At least where I live (California US), that's not true. There are certain things which trigger a change in taxable value, but they're mostly only indirectly connected to appraised …
-
comment
Comment #41057183
Just to be clear, do you believe milk.com is being squatted on right now? Should its registrant morally pay more than the default annual registration cost? If so: How does consiste…
-
comment
Comment #41052839
People pay registration fees every year for domains. How is what you propose different than registrars setting different fees for different domains? Or: What entity should be entit…
-
comment
Comment #41048889
Are you proposing every domain name registrant pay for an annual appraisal, whether or not they are planning on selling?
-
comment
Comment #41048854
I know of no truly serious offers for the domain, but why should that matter? I'm pretty sure residences aren't taxed based on un-accepted offers, for example.
-
comment
Comment #41043003
How would you calculate the FMV of milk.com?
-
comment
Comment #41042680
I don't think he wants offers?
-
comment
Comment #41042667
In what way is he actually speculating or rent seeking? He has a real website on it — not just a placeholder — and he's got DNS MX records, so it's presumably actively used for ema…
-
comment
Comment #41042626
This is also my take.
-
comment
Comment #23623030
Pretty sure the main answer is that he's not actually engaging in rent-seeking in any pejorative sense.
-
comment
Comment #23605234
Apple doesn't in fact have a blanket trademark on the word "apple."
-
comment
Comment #23595145
FWIW I don't think he actually ever intends to or expects to sell.
-
comment
Comment #23595059
My read on his "value" page is that he doesn't actually want to sell. Assuming he just wants to keep using the domain for his personal site and have the same email address he's had…
-
comment
Comment #23594857
I didn't ask for a definition. In what way does that apply to milk.com? Is the owner seeking to get wealthy from it? And if so, is he also somehow failing to create sufficient weal…
-
comment
Comment #23592884
What "rent" is he seeking?
-
comment
Comment #23592872
His brand is strong, perhaps.
-
comment
Comment #23592748
In what way is this site "squatting?" I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure you can't get a trademark on simple English words like "milk."
-
comment
Comment #19444415
I also wouldn't buy milk.com for $2000. Does that mean I should sell it for $2000? In any case, there is also a time / hassle reason to not sell: It would mean the loss of the only…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #19442395
I mean, I really would sell for $10MM. But I think I'd be giving someone a real steal for (much) less. Like, sure, I could use $100,000, but does that mean I should sell a more-val…
-
comment
Comment #19442283
For me too. Yes I am fortunate in multiple regards.
-
comment
Comment #19441569
I'm here for you.