Viewing profile — danceonfire
danceonfire
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 19, 2013, 1:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 17
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About danceonfire
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8035520
> 536931d80decb18c33db9612bdd004d4 susi Poor women called Susi.
-
comment
Comment #7738875
Striped? What about checkered? http://jsfiddle.net/F3KAc/5/
-
comment
Comment #7480484
Some of their demos run really bad on my machine. If they cracked the problem, they aren't showing it yet.
-
comment
Comment #7150280
That is exactly why my parent and I are correcting the title based on the content.
-
comment
Comment #7149714
It's about interviewing Frontend _Web_ Developers. I don't think someone who cannot write JavaScript can call himself a Frontend Web Developer.
-
comment
Comment #6942053
I don't get what this is all about. The title was (most probably) derived from Code Golf, which is a competition in coding something with as few characers as possible. Code Golf wa…
-
comment
Comment #6941556
The goal in code golf is lower character count, not lower score - which is also the case here.
-
comment
Comment #6514160
This was already discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6468617 a week ago.
-
comment
Comment #6301895
I do, but I still do not see a use case for me. When I'm on the go, I am almost always listening to music.
-
comment
Comment #6301598
I wonder if people that are interested in only the App to have their Headphones buttons remapped comfortably will be able to acquire that, and for what price. Not that I have done …
-
comment
Comment #6301570
Exactly my thought, too. > You can still use it if you have a pair of headphones in too, with the cans' play button subbing in for control. Sadly, my headphones do not have a butto…
-
comment
Comment #5674340
> ... where players volunteered to tested the patch to ensure that there were game-breaking exploits ... Is this an error? :) Although I assume the players would very well enjoy ga…
-
comment
Comment #5674313
No. The long scale of 420,081,335,014 would be 420 milliards, short scale being 420 billion.