Viewing profile — damarquis
damarquis
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 21, 2013, 2:00 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About damarquis
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9007159
I like the design. However, save draft button is not working for me.
-
comment
Comment #8498758
A fast algorithm for parity would be interesting. There is currently no better way to compute parity than factoring N. There is a well known hand wavy-argument that computing any f…
-
comment
Comment #6299538
"..that many people suspect of being compromisable by NSA etc." If it was a backdoor you certainly can't count it among the NSAs successes. It is never used.
-
comment
Comment #6244895
I agree this is a good idea but I think using the words "encrypt" and "decrypt" confuses the goal a little bit as this idea is still useful even if the message aren't required to b…
-
comment
Comment #6244559
"So post a PGP key and say, if you really want anonymity, use this." PGP only provides confidentiality, not anonymity. To get anonymity as well would require TOR.
-
comment
Comment #6196656
The only reason to use one-time pads is an extraordinary level of paranoia. If you are paranoid enough to need a one-time pad then it makes little sense for you as a private citize…
-
comment
Comment #6178039
I think it is mainly a logistical issue. The problem is that encryption keys are a single point of failure. IT practices at most businesses would have to be very rigorous before a …
-
comment
Comment #6156707
Nitpick: RSA isn't known to be backed by factoring. More precisely, there is no proof that if textbook-RSA encrypted messages could be decrypted quickly that integer factorization …
-
comment
Comment #6155923
The author's argument is that the probability of impact on ECC of this line of research is less than probability of an impact on factoring. Post-quantum cryptography has to avoid E…
-
comment
Comment #6154033
It makes no sense to argue that a non-existent product is vulnerable to a current exploit without a precise definition or specification of that product. Its an obvious mistake but …
-
comment
Comment #6130662
Don't forget that when decrypted the result must match the operation performed on the corresponding plaintexts.
-
comment
Comment #6084296
I don't see a reason this argument would apply to simulated rape but not simulated murder. A large number of people enjoy watching realistic simulated murder in movies, in TV, and …
-
comment
Comment #6062767
Of course anyone can follow you in public, the alternative would be impossible to enforce. The problem is that the cost of getting that data could be made unacceptably low. For exa…
-
comment
Comment #6062734
You are comfortable relying on stalkers not being persistent enough to search a list, save some metadata, and use google maps?
-
comment
Comment #6056915
"you don't need scientific evidence to know" "but it seems as intuitive" Knowledge can come only from reasoning based upon observations. You cannot know anything by intuition. You …
-
comment
Comment #6051228
I love some of the SO sites but they have a lot of communities that have been lingering in beta limbo for ages. I would be interested in more detail on how they reached the conclus…
-
comment
Comment #6045419
It is not clear that's what it is being said.
-
comment
Comment #6016306
I'm not arguing that there aren't situations where then spreading the belief that their capabilities are less than actual would be a good thing. If the goal is to break a specific …
-
comment
Comment #6014287
Cryptography software is usually critical but I think unlike the code for planes and nuclear power plants it doesn't necessarily have to be. Typically cryptography software is adve…
-
comment
Comment #6008590
Anonymous sources might be supplying real information but they could also be trying to manage beliefs. Undoubtedly the NSA is ahead of everyone else in cryptanalysis but I think it…
-
comment
Comment #6005135
"it's just a matter of time before RSA offers zero security" This is not the only possible outcome. Scalable quantum computing could turn out to be impractical due to cost. Or new …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #5997650
So either the NSA wanted a backdoor, in which case we learn that even the NSA can't build a backdoor that academic cryptographers can't detect. Or, much more likely I think, it was…
-
comment
Comment #5988365
I agree that if the game is fun people will play it. The problem is getting them to try the game for long enough to know if it is fun. Popularity is obviously a factor in achieving…
-
comment
Comment #5979176
The camp of people are both feminists and who care about making arguments based on good science called to say they want you to stop pretending they don't exist.