Viewing profile — dalyons
dalyons
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 17, 2010, 10:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,957
- Public activity
- 978 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dalyons
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49224295
Ok so this isn’t really a serious conversation?
-
comment
Comment #49217624
i dont really understand, if you hate working from home now (and it sounds like you have for a long time) why dont you switch to an in person role? there are certainly plenty of th…
-
comment
Comment #49217598
certainly not true in this case. The constant protests and clashes and deaths caused a significant national backlash, to the point that operations were dialed way down and even the…
-
comment
Comment #49151647
Why not? It all comes frozen anyway. Not particularly different from any other food
-
comment
Comment #48964898
and how did that work out? the site is dead now because of it
-
comment
Comment #48875119
personally i think we should just stop selling the leaded version, tomorrow. alternatives exist, update your planes or dont fly, but no more leaded fuel.
-
comment
Comment #48775615
Subscription money of $10 mo minus the cost of the cellular data connection and data, which is probably ~$8mo. So, a whopping profit of $24 a year? I hear this theory a lot but it …
-
comment
Comment #48698608
Having grown up in Australia I agree with everything you say. The percentage of property parasites as a % of the working population is staggering. Agree with all except maybe this:…
-
comment
Comment #48672546
If this is your situation consider asking for an ISO to NSO conversion. Many companies these days will allow you to do this, as they’ve realized it’s in their best interest to not …
-
comment
Comment #48657595
88% seems impossibly high. “Or controlled by” must be doing some heavy lifting. Government owned power is 9% of the US, 25% of Australia, 1% of the UK. If “or controlled by” means …
-
comment
Comment #48645470
The speed of change is what’s special this time. Careers are being eliminated faster than people can reskill or change careers.
-
comment
Comment #48638047
Yes? So? Fairly common shorthand when discussing electric power systems. No one confuses it with bombs, because that would be silly.
-
comment
Comment #48637910
Because no one wants to pay for a lifetime of inflated energy costs (nuclear) for the off chance of it helping in a black swan event. Humans aren’t wired that way, and neither is c…
-
comment
Comment #48637542
Your proposal is to use nuclear as only backup? Or for only late nights (after batteries have discharged)? That dooms nukes economically, they need to run and sell power at close t…
-
comment
Comment #48621771
There are relatively few oil exporting countries so probably not a big effect
-
comment
Comment #48609259
I absolutely agree we could see cost reductions with scale. Maybe 2x ? But solar is a much more simple manufacturing process that’s amenable to massive massive volume. Print silico…
-
comment
Comment #48594846
And I’m supposed to care? Old tech will be pushed off the grid by cheap renewables, and rapid dispatch gas will remain. Sounds great.
-
comment
Comment #48594828
Last two years for china. But yes? That’s because renewables finally got great. They’re momentum is not expected to slow down
-
comment
Comment #48594793
> If solar and wind can be made profitable, I don't see how nuclear is any different. Nuclear is fundamentally way more complicated than wind and especially solar. Nuclear is 10s o…
-
comment
Comment #48594697
They mostly don’t seem to agree, as exhibited by the fact that virtually none of them are breaking ground on new nukes.
-
comment
Comment #48594621
The increased demand is absolutely and categorically not being met by coal. Look it up, chinas total coal emissions have declined the last few years, despite overall demand growth.…
-
comment
Comment #48594599
This is just faith without evidence
-
comment
Comment #48594525
Finland is the definition of an outlier, and folks in similar situations make up a tiny percentage of the world population. They can burn gas for the next 50 years, and we can stil…
-
comment
Comment #48533665
Huh? Solar is widely acknowledged to be significantly cheaper than building new coal. And it is everywhere, you can just buy containers of it and have it delivered anywhere in the …
-
comment
Comment #48503342
Something like half of all bulk transport is moving fossil fuels around. So there’s already a huge win