Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dalyons

dalyons

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jun 17, 2010, 10:42 AM UTC
HN karma
1,957
Public activity
978 items

About dalyons

dalyons at gmail.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49224295

    Ok so this isn’t really a serious conversation?

  2. comment
    Comment #49217624

    i dont really understand, if you hate working from home now (and it sounds like you have for a long time) why dont you switch to an in person role? there are certainly plenty of th…

  3. comment
    Comment #49217598

    certainly not true in this case. The constant protests and clashes and deaths caused a significant national backlash, to the point that operations were dialed way down and even the…

  4. comment
    Comment #49151647

    Why not? It all comes frozen anyway. Not particularly different from any other food

  5. comment
    Comment #48964898

    and how did that work out? the site is dead now because of it

  6. comment
    Comment #48875119

    personally i think we should just stop selling the leaded version, tomorrow. alternatives exist, update your planes or dont fly, but no more leaded fuel.

  7. comment
    Comment #48775615

    Subscription money of $10 mo minus the cost of the cellular data connection and data, which is probably ~$8mo. So, a whopping profit of $24 a year? I hear this theory a lot but it …

  8. comment
    Comment #48698608

    Having grown up in Australia I agree with everything you say. The percentage of property parasites as a % of the working population is staggering. Agree with all except maybe this:…

  9. comment
    Comment #48672546

    If this is your situation consider asking for an ISO to NSO conversion. Many companies these days will allow you to do this, as they’ve realized it’s in their best interest to not …

  10. comment
    Comment #48657595

    88% seems impossibly high. “Or controlled by” must be doing some heavy lifting. Government owned power is 9% of the US, 25% of Australia, 1% of the UK. If “or controlled by” means …

  11. comment
    Comment #48645470

    The speed of change is what’s special this time. Careers are being eliminated faster than people can reskill or change careers.

  12. comment
    Comment #48638047

    Yes? So? Fairly common shorthand when discussing electric power systems. No one confuses it with bombs, because that would be silly.

  13. comment
    Comment #48637910

    Because no one wants to pay for a lifetime of inflated energy costs (nuclear) for the off chance of it helping in a black swan event. Humans aren’t wired that way, and neither is c…

  14. comment
    Comment #48637542

    Your proposal is to use nuclear as only backup? Or for only late nights (after batteries have discharged)? That dooms nukes economically, they need to run and sell power at close t…

  15. comment
    Comment #48621771

    There are relatively few oil exporting countries so probably not a big effect

  16. comment
    Comment #48609259

    I absolutely agree we could see cost reductions with scale. Maybe 2x ? But solar is a much more simple manufacturing process that’s amenable to massive massive volume. Print silico…

  17. comment
    Comment #48594846

    And I’m supposed to care? Old tech will be pushed off the grid by cheap renewables, and rapid dispatch gas will remain. Sounds great.

  18. comment
    Comment #48594828

    Last two years for china. But yes? That’s because renewables finally got great. They’re momentum is not expected to slow down

  19. comment
    Comment #48594793

    > If solar and wind can be made profitable, I don't see how nuclear is any different. Nuclear is fundamentally way more complicated than wind and especially solar. Nuclear is 10s o…

  20. comment
    Comment #48594697

    They mostly don’t seem to agree, as exhibited by the fact that virtually none of them are breaking ground on new nukes.

  21. comment
    Comment #48594621

    The increased demand is absolutely and categorically not being met by coal. Look it up, chinas total coal emissions have declined the last few years, despite overall demand growth.…

  22. comment
    Comment #48594599

    This is just faith without evidence

  23. comment
    Comment #48594525

    Finland is the definition of an outlier, and folks in similar situations make up a tiny percentage of the world population. They can burn gas for the next 50 years, and we can stil…

  24. comment
    Comment #48533665

    Huh? Solar is widely acknowledged to be significantly cheaper than building new coal. And it is everywhere, you can just buy containers of it and have it delivered anywhere in the …

  25. comment
    Comment #48503342

    Something like half of all bulk transport is moving fossil fuels around. So there’s already a huge win