Viewing profile — dakami
dakami
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 15, 2010, 11:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 103
- Public activity
- 53 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dakami
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14779960
Funny you should ask. I just looked into this: https://twitter.com/dakami/status/884715382061252608 Yeah. Ethereum blew up and all that compute is going towards GPU Mining.
-
comment
Comment #12721581
My understanding (and please correct me if I'm wrong!) is that it's pretty easy to burn out FPGAs, electrically, in a way that it's not particularly trivial to do with other sorts …
-
comment
Comment #12098871
Rust isn't a sandbox. The whole point of a sandbox is it survives incorrect software at runtime. Rust is compile time magic. Sure, cool, different thing.
-
comment
Comment #11824471
was that...like...a hundred megs for a web page?
-
comment
Comment #11803045
We don't build houses (he said from San Francisco)
-
comment
Comment #11729231
-D flag in OpenSSH.
-
comment
Comment #11715943
No apparent backend integration.
-
comment
Comment #11711489
Does Webstorm actually integrate with front end development? I'd like to whip together simple projects that aren't actually hideous, and literally every cloud IDE I'm finding just …
-
comment
Comment #11700346
Are your Win10 devices domain joined? Sounds like malware.
-
story
Ask HN: Is there a reasonable, actually integrated Web IDE out there?
It's kind of silly. There are design tools that don't let you write JavaScript. There are JavaScript tools that don't let you write server side JavaScript (or any other language). …
-
comment
Comment #11696036
So I just started experimenting with ZFS, because it seemed required for container snapshots. Then I found out it fragments badly, and nobody can figure out how to write a defragme…
-
comment
Comment #11673064
Ah, there you go. Repro code: #/usr/bin/python from random import * count=0 def get_bit(): global count count+=1 if (count%2)==0: return random() def get_fair_bit(): while 1: a=get…
-
comment
Comment #11672686
I'm not convinced Von Neumann debiasing is vulnerable like you think. You're dropping runs (00's and 11's) so you don't care if it's 90% 0 or 90% 1, you care if there's an even num…
-
comment
Comment #11670495
It's definitely based on my approach, but it's missing the concept a bit. The only way this approach gets entropy is if you cross two clocks at very different speeds, and get rando…
-
comment
Comment #11633995
I'm interested in more of your perspective here. I was around back in the Mojo Nation era as something of an observer, but there's lots maybe I didn't see.
-
comment
Comment #11633992
Where does he claim this?
-
comment
Comment #11626236
That's exactly what makes this cool! Since we know the signed hash is a chunk from the Blockchain that is most assuredly not Sartre, we also know with cryptographic certainty that …
-
comment
Comment #11625930
He said something was X, we have cryptographic proof it's Y.
-
comment
Comment #11625916
Everything before Bitcoin was really obsessed with anonymity, whereas Bitcoin was actually scared of centralization.
-
comment
Comment #11422009
I like the metaphor that ants are "cells with legs". Life really isn't constrained to any of our neat categorizations; life really is whatever works over time.
-
comment
Comment #11143701
You might be right, you might not be, in the general case. In the specific case getaddrinfo is not performance sensitive (to say the least) and that entire block could be specially…
-
comment
Comment #11143433
Very specifically, I'm interested in exploit mitigations that eliminate undefined states, rather than just hope an attacker doesn't know enough to redefine them. One can show "zomb…
-
comment
Comment #11143414
I've updated the post with further details.
-
comment
Comment #11142735
No argument from me about the seriousness of issues like Rowhammer. Computers are built in layers, and layers require reduction to logical assumptions. The degree to which Rowhamme…
-
comment
Comment #11139677
If this bug ends up traversing caches, it'll affect Amazon just like everything else. That the bug is so resistant to clear-cut answers on cache traversal vulnerability is unique, …