Viewing profile — daira
daira
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 20, 2014, 4:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 20
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About daira
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #22013670
> BLAKE3 appears to have 128 bits of security against all attacks. That's not accurate. The best pseudo-preimage attack on BLAKE2s has complexity 2^{253.8} against 6.75 rounds (sec…
-
comment
Comment #18534893
There's a pretty detailed proposal of a privacy-preserving L2 solution for Zcash, called BOLT ( https://z.cash/blog/bolt-private-payment-channels/ ). The original paper is at https…
-
comment
Comment #16583126
Disabling SharedArrayBuffer is just stopping the most obvious method of exploitation; it's by no means a fix. Expect a slew of papers over the next few years on other methods of ex…
-
comment
Comment #15574975
But you don't detect that one case where you are actually compromised. You dismiss it like you do all the false positives. At best, when you get pwned you think back to having dism…
-
comment
Comment #14146411
The legacy codebase issue we are lamenting there is just that the code inherited from Bitcoin is in C++. It's of course possible to interface between C++ and Rust, and that's what …
-
comment
Comment #14146380
As far as I know we've never claimed that the distribution is flat or that the "effective anonymity" is equivalent to a uniform distribution over prior notes (I certainly didn't cl…
-
comment
Comment #14146330
Note that the number of prior shielded transactions (not the proportion, and not the value) is what is actually relevant to the privacy of new shielded transactions. Roughly speaki…
-
comment
Comment #13813440
This bug had nothing to do with Zcash. Please correct your comment to say Zcoin, if that's what you meant. In any case, Zcash is also derived from Bitcoin and builds with `-Werror`…
-
comment
Comment #13813347
Zcash, for example, is built with `-Werror` (edit: not `-Wall`, but we're working on that). So this is absolutely feasible on a Bitcoin-derived codebase.
-
comment
Comment #13676151
No, that is not the bug. See Ian Miers' comments.
-
comment
Comment #13676104
I'm not aware of any proof that Borromean signatures, relied on by CT, are secure assuming only ECDLP. There is certainly no such proof in the paper https://github.com/Blockstream/…
-
comment
Comment #13675950
This isn't a subtle or difficult-to-find case. It's a case of "why the heck would anyone write code like that, in any language, in the first place?" The only language-level abstrac…
-
comment
Comment #13675923
Just to clarify, the code that was duplicated per denomination is not part of libzerocoin itself, it's in main.cpp. I'm not sure who wrote it; it may or may not have been part of t…
-
comment
Comment #13675831
The crypto used in Confidential Transactions, or any implementation of it, does not only rely on ECDLP. There's plenty of scope for potential protocol or implementation errors. (Th…
-
comment
Comment #12986189
There are ways to significantly reduce the cost of zk proof verification by batching (that are compatible with the existing Zcash protocol without a fork).
-
comment
Comment #12986167
Fixed in Zcash 1.0.3. (They were always "working", despite the bugs that were recently fixed. You can see plenty of successful z-address transactions on the blockchain.)
-
comment
Comment #12986157
The concern in that last sentence seems misplaced; there is no relation between proportion of monetary base held by an attacker, and proportion of mining power held by an attacker.…
-
comment
Comment #12986146
Basically yes. Strictly speaking privacy also relies on assumptions about Curve25519 (with a Blake2b-based key derivation function) and ChaCha20, but those are standard and uncontr…
-
comment
Comment #11458075
It's a bit more complicated than that. The main responsibility for implementing connection layer unlinkability lies with Tor (if you use Zcash over Tor, which we will aim to provid…
-
comment
Comment #11457959
Of course they've had to pay. In the case of the investors, they've had to pay cash up-front to fund the development of Zcash. In the case of other shareholders of Zerocoin Electri…
-
comment
Comment #7535496
I don't actually see any assertions on this thread by natdempk or tptacek claiming that TextSecure is "trustworthy" and/or "solid". Did I miss something? My own opinion is that bot…
-
comment
Comment #7534551
The scopes had a great deal of overlap; although we (Least Authority) didn't consider the iOS client at all, the rest of iSec's audit has essentially the same scope as ours. The po…
-
comment
Comment #7520960
Actually I strongly suggest reading these in conjunction with iSec's issues 12 through 16, because each team spotted some details that the other missed.
-
comment
Comment #7520913
Findings iSEC-RFACC0114-1 and iSEC-RFACC0114-3. (2 out of the 17 vulnerabilities found by iSec, of varying severity.)
-
comment
Comment #7520508
This issue (or one with very similar effect) was also found by the Least Authority audit: https://github.com/cryptocat/cryptocat/issues/607 (The 'issue E' that it references is htt…