Viewing profile — d0odk
d0odk
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 12, 2023, 2:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 83
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About d0odk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47844168
it's not securities fraud if investors make a lot of money
-
comment
Comment #47373347
Yes, that's what I'm addressing with my comment above.
-
comment
Comment #47372270
Ethically, if you extend this reasoning, are we not obligated to find a position in the most morally repulsive organization we are aware of, and then coast?
-
comment
Comment #45838265
If you show revenue, people will ask "How much?" And it will never be enough, but if you have no revenue, you can say you're pre-revenue. You're a potential pure play. It's not abo…
-
comment
Comment #45751398
My gut instinct is that this would be a hugely underperforming investment strategy on both an absolute and risk adjusted basis. I would welcome empirical evidence contradicting my …
-
comment
Comment #44802580
I directionally agree with you. But there are plenty of examples of scientists being extremely petty, political or egotistical further back in history. Newton and Leibniz. Gauss wi…
-
comment
Comment #44585402
The article has several paragraphs addressing these points...
-
comment
Comment #43636185
You can just sell the options. You don't need to exercise.
-
comment
Comment #43346648
Dan Simmons' books often include AI plot elements and contemplate the consequences of humans becoming overly reliant on AI such that they lose basic competencies.
-
comment
Comment #43178364
Ah, that makes sense. Given your original comment, I was considering unevenly distributed life across an infinite universe. But you're right of course, that is irrelevant to the fe…
-
comment
Comment #43174972
Isn't that just the observable universe?
-
comment
Comment #40648407
With AI, there can be more content, produced faster and probably more cheaply, that is tailored to individual users.
-
comment
Comment #40238425
Do you think every business owns the land and building it operates in? Real estate is expensive. Maintaining a building is expensive. There are plenty of businesses that rent to av…
-
comment
Comment #40092539
Critique of Pure Reason is Kant. I thought you were making a joke based on the earlier mixup between Kant and Wittgenstein. Late Wittgenstein is Philosophical Investigations. There…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40091546
Have you read later Wittgenstein?
-
comment
Comment #40091537
My gripe is that the commenter above cites early Wittgenstein as an example of the failure of philosophy as a whole, while ignoring (or perhaps being unaware) that later Wittgenste…
-
comment
Comment #40089627
Okay, but you initially criticized Wittgenstein, the philosopher, not Tractatus, the work. Wittgenstein himself would agree that Tractatus is deeply flawed. He wrote his more influ…
-
comment
Comment #40089170
Someone who is discrediting all of philosophy shouldn't confuse Wittgenstein and Kant. Further, Wittgenstein disavowed Tractatus as a failed project and completely revised his appr…
-
comment
Comment #39900226
The gp gets carry
-
comment
Comment #39282900
Any particular papers you would recommend? The links are to blogs with lots of papers.
-
comment
Comment #39281998
Thanks. Appreciate your feedback. Do you think LLMs have meaningfully greater capabilities than existing tools (like Kira)? I take your point on low stakes contracts vs. sophistica…
-
comment
Comment #39281331
In fairness some lawyers will too, haha. I take your point, though. Good lawyers care about their reputation and strive to protect it.
-
comment
Comment #39281194
How do you think organizations can best use the contractual interpretations provided by LLMs? To expand on that, good lawyers don't just provide contractual interpretations, they p…
-
comment
Comment #39280892
It's a logical reaction, at least superficially, to the touted capabilities of Gen AI and LLMs. But once you start trying to use the tech for actual legal applications, it doesn't …