Viewing profile — czardoz
czardoz
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 22, 2013, 6:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 624
- Public activity
- 167 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About czardoz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47106135
Exactly. OpenClaw is good, but expects the model to behave in a certain way, and I've found that the local options aren't smart enough to keep up. That being said, my gut says that…
-
comment
Comment #47106073
Really looking for a minimal assistant that works with _locally hosted models_. Are there any options?
-
comment
Comment #36624130
If this stack is heavily skewed towards numerical computations, Cinder might require a lot of tuning to be effective.
-
comment
Comment #36623837
It has some elements of WSGI, but has expanded into its own thing which supports asyncio (this happened before ASGI was a thing).
-
comment
Comment #36623812
I'd love to see lazy imports become part of the upstream at some point.
-
comment
Comment #36623800
Cinder's feature set is highly optimized for IO bound web services that run under a forked-worker model. For example: you start a main process, warm it up with a few requests, run …
-
comment
Comment #36621884
I worked on Cinder, and on the web server. Happy to answer technical questions if any :)
-
comment
Comment #34512783
I'm always surprised when patterns like this actually work. But they do!
-
comment
Comment #31116720
This article captures a lot of the rationale behind why we're building Static Python within Cinder: https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder#static-python
-
comment
Comment #28788425
One minor clarification here: Cinder[1] is actually 100% compatible with C extensions (by virtue of being a fork of CPython). [1]: https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder
-
comment
Comment #28708941
I've moved to Zoho mail. It's $1/month for a single user, which seems to be well worth it. The catch is, it's not possible to _send_ from Zoho without creating additional users (wh…
-
comment
Comment #27054232
Can you elaborate on what you mean by "skip" Cython compilation on dev builds? How would you then test changes to Cython code?
-
comment
Comment #27053206
Unlike RPython, Static Python in cinder is not really a subset of Python, it can compile everything (although it will throw compile time errors if it sees mismatched types). If it …
-
comment
Comment #27053037
> Why is “developers might have to interact with it” some kind of non-starter, as though having a compile phase is a worse evil than a hyper-slow language? For big monoliths (like …
-
comment
Comment #27046535
> Well, the compilation step is alredy present in current py -> pyc phase Yes, but developers don't have to ever interact with it. > Also, look at how cython work Cython works by a…
-
comment
Comment #27044691
> So much stuff just from the readme would introduce breaking changes to the Python ecosystem. Being compatible with the rest of the Python ecosystem is the main reason why Cinder …
-
comment
Comment #27044280
Here's some good documentation about v8's JIT: https://github.com/thlorenz/v8-perf/blob/master/compiler.md Note: Never worked on v8, just liked the information here.
-
comment
Comment #27043945
Yes, Static Python especially relies heavily on strict modules, since they enable us to perform module-local analysis, which enables some cool optimizations.
-
comment
Comment #26243210
There's nothing wrong with gotos in compiled code. At the end of the day, machine code is really just a bunch of gotos with other instructions in between. The reason goto is consid…
-
comment
Comment #26099694
> Why do I need methods to have underscores in 2021, but classes to use camel case? Why do my lines of code need to fit on a punched card invented decades before the language was i…
-
comment
Comment #25000661
No, look up "pip"
-
comment
Comment #24712600
I guess that depends on how you define "space"
-
comment
Comment #24184294
> Google pays a trivial amount of tax here. Google provides a lot of value with their free products too. Aren't you discounting that?
-
comment
Comment #22932978
That's completely tangential to the discussion. No one's trying to figure out who to blame for spreading the virus. The point I was trying to make was, restrictions on personal fre…
-
comment
Comment #22930839
You're talking about this as if a "calculated risk" is limited to that individual, but it's not. Someone's "calculated risk" is literally death knell for others. In this case, the …