Viewing profile — curtis17
curtis17
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 29, 2013, 11:37 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About curtis17
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8313308
fn bugs me as well. fun would have been better: - ML heritage for named functions (fn was anon) - muscle memory with the leading part of javascript function - the other abbreviatio…
-
comment
Comment #8308245
> but it is no more pragmatic than OCaml or F#. Swift seems more approachable then those languages. Pragmatic in the sense that Rust and Kotlin are.
-
comment
Comment #8304267
Swift seems a pragmatic take on functional programming. Apple backing means the compiler, libs and runtime will get a lot of work.
-
comment
Comment #8299235
> Or would that enable a Linux port? I would be interested in a Swift port for Linux server-side/command line dev. Not so much client UI dev. Swift on Linux servers could help Appl…
-
comment
Comment #8277326
Scala moving in a similar direction. Odersky: That's going to be a more fundamental rethink of what Scala is. The main goal is to make it simpler, to review it or work out what its…
-
comment
Comment #8268197
The most interesting way forward re languages/runtimes looks like something Brendan mentioned here: http://javascriptjabber.com/124-jsj-the-origin-of-javascript... > At some point,…
-
comment
Comment #8253917
Kotlin could be the Swift for Android if Jetbrains make it an explicit goal and gain developer mindshare. Also, Kotlin can compile down to JS and can thus target another Google pla…
-
comment
Comment #8252261
Apple could have big plans for their ARM64 platform. Anand could be part of it.
-
comment
Comment #8192741
If Google can't resolve their differences with Oracle Kotlin could be a way forward. Especially given the Android Studio connection.
-
comment
Comment #8075914
Value types with operator overloading. Expressive and good for performance. Open? Java is owned by Oracle. C# is better and more expressive than Java. Especially the functional/dec…
-
comment
Comment #8075653
Android needs to evolve away from Java. It needs a Swift - something richer, more expressive, focused on modern 64bit platforms and above all open.
-
comment
Comment #8071080
Definitely not alone. At the Google IO Android Fireside Chat, a developer asked the Android team about using an alternative to Java for development - Scala in his case. Pretty much…
-
comment
Comment #8070081
Dart is interesting but a little too Jave-ery in both syntax and tools - Dart Editor is Eclipse based. Also, not sure how committed Google is long-term. Google's issue is too many …
-
comment
Comment #8069561
Google have issues with Oracle. Why not bless an alt-Java and give developers a clear signal. The end game should be Kotlin or Xtend or ? -> Dalvik/ART. Cut out Java.
-
comment
Comment #8069358
I totally agree with the original poster. I picked up Java in the mid-90's for server-side dev. Grew to loathe it. When Google announced an open-source OS for mobile - I was so hap…
-
comment
Comment #8069224
Imo Android needs a Swift because: 1. Java is too verbose/tedious. Developers are looking for something richer/more expressive. 2. Oracle. Java is non-open. Ultimately, the languag…
-
comment
Comment #8022626
Same here. I want to get away from Java and the JVM. Twenty years old and now owned by Oracle.
-
comment
Comment #7970225
Yes. My understanding is that currently the Android ART toolchain is: Java source -> Java byte code -> Dalvik byte code in apk -> install time compile to Oat file for execution in …
-
story
Like Android, but not Java/XML. Any alternatives?
Android L with the Material design language looks very attractive. But I really dislike the Java/XML combo for development. So, anyone tried the alt-Java's for coding Android apps:…
-
comment
Comment #7956960
WinRT was not built on the CLR. MS didn't eat it's own dogfood. Divided story between Windows Phone and Windows 8. MS should open source the CLR. Also, the new MRT - minimal native…
-
comment
Comment #7926795
True re Google's experiments. Given there's one guy in charge of Android and Chrome/OS developers could use a clearer direction. Preferably an alternative to Java (Kotlin?) which c…
-
comment
Comment #7926777
Given Google's relationship with Jetbrains for Android Studio how about Kotlin. Cut out Java entirely: Kotlin -> ART. Kotlin seems approachable and modern. Also compiles down to JS…
-
comment
Comment #7772560
Licences and a cut from app/content sales. The problem with the Linux desktop is the 'everything is free' mentality.
-
comment
Comment #7772441
Adobe are in the position to do for Linux what Apple did for BSD/Darwin. Adobe OS. Take the Linux kernel, systemd and command line tools. Put a great gui on top. With Creative Suit…
-
comment
Comment #7722253
My only use of Java is for Android. The Android VM - Dalvik - uses Dalvik not JVM byte code. Now ART - the new Android runtime replacing Dalvik - is native - no more byte code. The…