Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ctalledo

ctalledo

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 12:34 AM UTC
HN karma
84
Public activity
41 items

About ctalledo

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29984088

    Thanks again for the detailed response. > Have a look at what gVisor actually does I am aware of what it does, though I had missed the fact that the Sentry and/or Gopher run within…

  2. comment
    Comment #29973170

    LXD is great, but one nice feature of Sysbox is that it's an OCI-based runtime, and therefore integrates with Docker, K8s, etc. In a way, Sysbox turns Docker containers or Kubernet…

  3. comment
    Comment #29972549

    Thanks for the feedback; I am one of the developers of Sysbox. Some answers to the above comments: - Regarding the container isolation, Sysbox uses a combination of Linux user-name…

  4. comment
    Comment #29122437

    Hi HN, this is Cesar, one of the developers behind Sysbox, a next-generation "runc". Sysbox enables containers (or pods) to act as "VM-like" environments, capable of running system…

  5. story
  6. story
    Show HN: Rootless Containers/Pods that run systemd, Docker, and even Kubernetes

    Hi HN, this is Cesar and Rodny, developers of an open-source container runtime called Sysbox, and co-founders of a startup called Nestybox (YC S20). We launched on HN almost a year…

  7. comment
    Comment #26627503

    Thanks! Yes, if you wish to setup dev environments backed by Docker or K8s containers/pods, Sysbox is an excellent way to do so because it gives you a rootless container inside of …

  8. story
    Sysbox v0.3 Released

    Hi HN, my name is Cesar, I am one of the lead developers of Sysbox (https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox), an enhanced "runc" that enables rootless containers to act as "VM-like" env…

  9. comment
    Comment #25232375

    If you are using Docker-in-Docker, you may want to checkout the new Sysbox runtime (find it on Github). It's a new type of runc that sits below Docker and creates rootless containe…

  10. comment
    Comment #24236749

    +1 for the Emacs client.

  11. comment
    Comment #24123576

    Thanks; one thing I may have omitted mentioning is that Sysbox works with the fast overlayfs storage driver, meaning that when you do use it for Docker-in-Docker for example, both …

  12. comment
    Comment #24123536

    Agreed; it's certainly something we will keep in mind as we mature Sysbox.

  13. comment
    Comment #24104699

    A use case that we often get asked about for Docker-in-Docker is using the outer container as a dev environment that includes a developer's tools, ssh, and a dedicated Docker (CLI …

  14. comment
    Comment #24097071

    Ubuntu carries a few things that Sysbox relies on: a couple that come to mind are the shiftfs module (which Sysbox uses to enable the user-namespace in containers without requiring…

  15. comment
    Comment #24093496

    There is plenty of info on Kubernetes (K8s) on the web, so I would start there. As far as running K8s inside Docker containers though, the use case would be one in which you want t…

  16. comment
    Comment #24093423

    This is something we've not tried yet, so I don't know. I would be surprised if it worked right now. But in general, it's something we would definitely be interested in exploring. …

  17. comment
    Comment #24093298

    We felt just providing enterprise support would not be sufficient to create a healthy business, given that Sysbox is designed to work under the covers (i.e., under docker/container…

  18. comment
    Comment #24090659

    Take a look at the Nestybox blog site: https://blog.nestybox.com/ It has an article on Docker sandboxing. Hope that helps!

  19. comment
    Comment #24090630

    Correct; Sysbox always enables the user-namespace in containers and manages the subuid/subgid allocation. In the open-source version, it assigns all containers the same subuid/subg…

  20. comment
    Comment #24090576

    Thanks @lopezator.

  21. comment
    Comment #24090561

    That's funny ... brings back memories of the 90s :) One thing I've noticed is that in modern IT infrastructure, there is usually two levels of sandboxing going on. At the low level…

  22. comment
    Comment #24090515

    It's hard to compare them because the goals are different. Kata containers seeks to harden container security by wrapping it with a highly optimized VM. Sysbox seeks to enable cont…

  23. comment
    Comment #24088795

    Please take a look at these examples and let us know if they help: https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox/blob/master/docs/quicksta...

  24. comment
    Comment #24088748

    Got it; note that inside a system container you can always run docker-in-docker using privileged containers ( https://hub.docker.com/_/docker ). That is, you don't need sysbox nest…

  25. comment
    Comment #24088732

    Yes, as long as you can install Sysbox on the EC2 nodes, you are good to go.