Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — csirac2

csirac2

HN member
Joined
Sun, May 05, 2013, 6:41 AM UTC
HN karma
552
Public activity
254 items

About csirac2

I make software & systems: software defined radio, embedded Linux, build/test automation, data viz, web stuff. Electronics & infosec enthusiast.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41243900

    > It's not courtesy if it's non consensual, same way that wealth redistribution isn't charity I truly don't understand what you are talking about. When I was in primary school, and…

  2. comment
    Comment #41235445

    Can I just say what a genuinely fascinating perspective you have there That pronouns are somehow an exercise of power that must be submitted to, and not just a common courtesy beca…

  3. comment
    Comment #40398673

    If you want to bring up CS101 so badly, surely turing machines and lambda calculus would be more relevant. The actually interesting claim is that somebody has found a practical use…

  4. comment
    Comment #36646936

    I don't disagree that Python's place in the ecosystem ("generalist" - i.e. load-bearing distro fossilization in everything from old binary linux distros, container layers, SIEM/SOA…

  5. comment
    Comment #20130530

    Technologists certainly tend to seek solutions, and find blame in technology or the application of it. Getting technology right is necessary, but not sufficient. In the end, the wo…

  6. comment
    Comment #20128857

    ... Does this statement come from having actually used things like Hadoop on Sun Grid Engine or any of Sun's other products? Or... what? What knowledge are you drawing on? Edit: I …

  7. comment
    Comment #17483032

    I wish folks would use the taint mode they might already have. At some point taint checking bugs stopped being release blockers in core ruby & perl, but having worked through movin…

  8. comment
    Comment #12397493

    Worryingly, the 2015 paper didn't seem to have anything about measuring the mass of the device before and after the experiment. An old radar technician asked me to take a look... a…

  9. comment
    Comment #11796475

    FWIW Firefox manages to use W^X in their JIT (the experimental patch back in 2011 had a very interesting idea: one process w writing out to memory mapped RW, another process with t…

  10. comment
    Comment #11796159

    I think we "outsider" engineers forget (or miss the point on) why amateur radio enjoys the spectrum privileges it does: education, technical investigations, research... things that…

  11. comment
    Comment #11286687

    For me, I find it interesting to see which site sells my email address to unrelated marketers/spammers.

  12. comment
    Comment #11207977

    Agreed; also in .au, the last time I presented a cheque (in 2011) the poor newbie teenage bank teller strained to recall his training. He processed it ok, but panicked so badly he …

  13. comment
    Comment #11190237

    I've just read https://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2016/linux-kernel-cddl... - and whilst I still think the Conservancy is being reasonable, I can also see now how Canonical migh…

  14. comment
    Comment #11184838

    The conservancy's current level of input to the debate is appropriate. They're clearly not expending resources they don't have for this discussion. Also, they spent years with VMWa…

  15. comment
    Comment #11180456

    I see your point more clearly now, I guess we still differ on priorities. Having such a key player within the open source community normalize GPL violation seems somewhat urgent to…

  16. comment
    Comment #11179691

    > It's "you can't provide binaries without also providing source code", not "you can't do binaries". Edit: It's "without also providing source code under the terms of the GPL " - t…

  17. comment
    Comment #11179471

    > "distribute the binary, not okay; distribute the source + tell user to 'make', okay" That's literally what the GPL says. Look, I'm not a GPL zealot. The only thing even vaguely w…

  18. comment
    Comment #11179249

    > It's not their fault that people have a completely fucked up interpretation of "derivative work" that includes any combination of two completely separately developed works. Indee…

  19. comment
    Comment #11179242

    I read it as pointing out that it's not up to Canonical to defacto re-license other people's work. Only the copyright holder can do that.

  20. comment
    Comment #11179230

    NVidia doesn't ship GPL'd code, and GPL distros don't ship NVidia code. It's the user who downloads it and doesn't redistribute it. This is entirely unlike VMWare, who really did m…

  21. comment
    Comment #11143830

    I've read that - no mention of LGPL or why people are still bothering with it, if the GPL already does what the LGPL was designed to do.

  22. comment
    Comment #11123706

    My head is exploding. If this doesn't violate the GPL... what was the whole point of the LGPL again?

  23. comment
    Comment #11115341

    Having worked with a few asian/eastern engineers, I do believe that a number of things conspire against western maths education: our culture doesn't value mathematics competency (i…

  24. comment
    Comment #11109772

    The spirit of amateur radio rights in most jurisdictions is that of an open/public communications medium that any licensed person can join in on (it has twitter-like aspects in tha…

  25. comment
    Comment #11106815

    EDIT: Ordinary differential equations, yes - we do here in .au, at least in Maths C (advanced maths) in Queensland. Partial differential equations, the kind that are very useful in…