Viewing profile — cruise02
cruise02
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 20, 2009, 3:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,853
- Public activity
- 417 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cruise02
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #12855314
Open source would not be nearly as impressive as reproducible.
-
comment
Comment #12719832
It isn't arrogant to assume other people are at least as well read as you are. It would be arrogant to assume that they aren't.
-
comment
Comment #12719367
It probably isn't if you're coming at the material for the first time, or after a long break. I took a 15-week course in Linear Algebra a few months ago, and we only covered about …
-
comment
Comment #12718454
> Periodically over on Stack Overflow (and in many other programming forums) the question comes up about what books are good for programmers to read. The question has been asked an…
-
comment
Comment #11298050
If you have to make this kind of leap to support your argument, you don't have an argument.
-
comment
Comment #11297933
That's not discrimination against young people because it's not saying that young people aren't allowed to ride the bus, just that they have to pay the regular price. (Also, most c…
-
comment
Comment #11296891
Yeah, I'd hate to be exposed to eight more great films if they were made by women. /s
-
comment
Comment #10814578
Please do advertise that since there's a reason for stereotypes, your company uses them in making hiring decisions. Let me know how that goes over.
-
comment
Comment #10814210
Use some common sense. For how many values of $x that would be the subject of an interview question are 5 year olds going to be better than grandmothers?
-
comment
Comment #10813506
"...to a 5 year old" should be pretty safe. "...to your grandmother" could be construed as both sexist and ageist, so I'd avoid it.
-
comment
Comment #10692302
And yet, people still don't make a new pot when they take the last of the old.
-
comment
Comment #10663754
If a bot can detect that you "don't buy feminist agenda," then it is evaluating based on content, not on sex or race.
-
comment
Comment #10559807
That's all fine and good in an environment where people can actually come to physical harm, but this article is about academia. I think we need to stop excusing asshole behavior in…
-
comment
Comment #10515525
J.K. Rowling pays her tax. http://www.businessinsider.com/jk-rowling-on-high-taxes-2012...
-
comment
Comment #10473142
I guess I can understand how people might become confused if their concept of socialism comes from a single satirical book about egalitarianism.
-
comment
Comment #10472846
> Instead of helping everyone... Yes, that's exactly what socialism is based on.
-
comment
Comment #10452170
There's another potential asymmetry between the number of times you write something vs. how many people read it/how many times it is read.
-
comment
Comment #10452148
Also note that an increase from 0.5% to 0.6% would be the same amount of "increased risk." Always look for the base rate.
-
comment
Comment #10452140
Yes, the impact of a 1 percentage point increase is significant, but it's nowhere near the bloodbath that an increase of 18 percentage points would be, which is how I think most pe…
-
comment
Comment #10451756
It's important to understand what "increased risk" means. From the linked article: > The IARC’s experts concluded that each 50-gram (1.8-ounce) portion of processed meat eaten dail…
-
comment
Comment #10440704
Only one character is going to be marked in this case, not a whole line or section of code. Deleting it and retyping it costs one second. I guess I've seen more than my fair share …
-
comment
Comment #10440533
> Replace a semicolon (;) with a greek question mark (;) in your friend's C# code and watch them pull their hair out over the syntax error I'm not sure how frustrating this would b…
-
comment
Comment #10438769
They can start with everyone who is involved in translating sports stories into emoji.
-
comment
Comment #10427708
It's not officially Fall until Lucy pulls away the football.
-
comment
Comment #10421324
Yes, I read the article, and I understood it. But thanks for explaining it to me anyway.