Viewing profile — cronokirby
cronokirby
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 16, 2019, 6:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 22
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cronokirby
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33406123
A subtle point which I don't really explain in the post, since it was initially targeted to people who had done some cryptography with groups before, is that you need to carefully …
-
comment
Comment #32849913
That is true. That said, there are few situations where the modulus being used is not a public parameter of a protocol, and it is very difficult to perform operations with a secret…
-
comment
Comment #32849810
If you have a random stream of bits, and you use rejection sampling to extract a value from that stream, then you don't reveal any information about the value. At most, you reveal …
-
comment
Comment #32641384
It does sometimes get abused, but such abuses fall under wire fraud laws, which carry heavy punishments. So, the legal system is the prevention mechanism for abuse here.
-
comment
Comment #32605717
One big difference is the density of the fuel. You can fill a car with gas in under a minute. While fast-charging (like Tesla's super charging) has growing deployment, that's still…
-
comment
Comment #30491821
Reading this post, this is actually an explanation of Schnorr signatures, not ECDSA signatures. Bitcoin uses the latter, except for new transactions after the Taproot update, which…
-
comment
Comment #27248492
Sleeping just long enough to fill the remaining time-slot for an operation is actually a valid countermeasure; in theory. The problem is figuring out how much sleep is necessary ba…
-
comment
Comment #27247602
Author here. To illustrate my point further, let's say that your operation takes either 0.1ms or 0.0ms. If you add in a uniform random delay of 100-1000ms, your expected random del…
- story