Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cronjobber

cronjobber

HN member
Joined
Mon, Dec 29, 2014, 9:42 AM UTC
HN karma
1,527
Public activity
354 items

About cronjobber

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14858225

    I stand corrected, RFC 4038 seems to be what I was looking for. But it seems to be a late addition, and OS support is optional. If developers think moving their apps to IPv6 is too…

  2. comment
    Comment #14855619

    IPv6 could have done three things. First, embed the "legacy" address space. Second, have legacy-to-legacy connections use v4 on the wire. Third, strongly encourage existing user-ma…

  3. comment
    Comment #14854816

    It sucks at being compatible with ipv4. The "billion dollar mistake" :-) It also sucks at having software/hardware stacks nearly as well debugged as those for ipv4, which means run…

  4. comment
    Comment #14854667

    "We" don't have to move to ipv6, even if "they" have to. The internet can plausibly support both protocols forever.

  5. comment
    Comment #14846904

    From the article: "It’s not like they’re bumping it by a buck and making a little bit more money. They are really tanking sales and it kind of has a ripple effect to us, being a sm…

  6. comment
    Comment #14840156

    For entertainment purposes only: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fac...

  7. comment
    Comment #14837628

    Google introduced and normalized the spyware/adware business model. Nothing but fawning adoration from programmers. Microsoft copied the model for operating systems. Token resistan…

  8. comment
    Comment #14837492

    > Economics and politics haven't caught up with this yet. That seems unlikely. Political and economic leadership throughout the "White West" has been subsidizing and expanding the …

  9. comment
    Comment #14799598

    > but what solution do you have? It isn't easy, but as long as nation states are plausibly more powerful than Google, we—humanity—can hope. Use antitrust to inhibit moves like the …

  10. comment
    Comment #14788400

    You are wrong, like most homeopathy critics. Have you ever observed typical homeopathy users—middle to upper-middle class mothers of young children—in their natural habitat? I have…

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #14781742

    Most of your comments would be vastly improved by omitting the reams of repl output.

  13. comment
    Comment #14747474

    Because my reading of the article is that Google doesn't restrict the policy to Google ads. > publishers have to also be responsible for any ad networks or affiliates they have on …

  14. comment
    Comment #14747045

    Antitrust regulators should look into this one. EDIT: ...because the policy punishes advertisers use of other advertising providers.

  15. comment
    Comment #14746985

    True. Sadly. Alas, while Russian (and Chinese) general disinterest in f'ing with you does help, their equally developed general disinterest in your well-being means they might have…

  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #14742821

    > What do you think? I have no way of knowing how such changes would affect the wider installed base of FSet. All I can tell you is what I'd prefer myself. I wouldn't mind, and act…

  18. comment
    Comment #14729758

    You are right, the 1960 paper describes a language that is a pure functional language. I think it even was the first published pure functional language (pointers to earlier work we…

  19. comment
    Comment #14729715

    Does Clojure predate FSet? If you hadn't written "now" here, I'd have guessed otherwise. My only complaint about FSet would be map default values; not necessarily the fact they exi…

  20. comment
    Comment #14729632

    Dupe, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14697330

  21. comment
    Comment #14716400

    Incremental recompilation isn't fast enough to wait for between keystrokes, so in-process servers would run in their own thread. Along with accounting for arbitrarily incompatible …

  22. comment
    Comment #14699643

    > Some population groups are surviving hybrids but the percentage is very small The pure genotypes were obviously out-competed, surviving Europeans and (East?) Asians are descendan…

  23. comment
    Comment #14699562

    Timing. Where do you think G slots in the timeline, relative to the Latin classics?

  24. comment
    Comment #14699454

    How's wot? As far as I have been informed, [1] surviving Europeans/Asians are Neanderthalized (hybrids), and [2] no pure Neanderthals are living today.

  25. comment
    Comment #14699319

    And yet Neanderthalized hybrids are the only known survivors coming out of whatever happened between those species.