Viewing profile — createdapril24
createdapril24
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 25, 2021, 2:02 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 382
- Public activity
- 48 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About createdapril24
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40321807
Oh interesting. No rebut of specific points or facts, just blanket disagreement? I think its hard to call a whole article "correct" or "incorrect." This article makes many assumpti…
-
comment
Comment #40320606
It needs to be noted that these drone videos are highly filtered - they are used as fundraising tools by Ukraine Armed Force units and then what "trends" are the spectacular videos…
-
comment
Comment #40315481
I see your point and I think you have a reasonable point of view, although I don't share it because I think to have that point of view you have to make assumptions I'm not comforta…
-
comment
Comment #40315452
This is an interesting comment and its great to see a source. I just want to add a bit to France's threats to deploy troops to Ukraine for direct conflict. There's a serious case t…
-
comment
Comment #40315393
In theory, sure, but those swarm shows are pre-programmed: they aren't reacting dynamically to a (chaotic) situation on the ground and they aren't communicating with operators. The…
-
comment
Comment #40315355
I disagree with this other than that Ukraine will definitely lose if its backers stop supporting it. It's not really clear that Russia would surely lose the war of attrition. A rea…
-
comment
Comment #40315304
That's partly the point yeah. Every war is an iterative set of actions and mitigations. The point I'm making is that so far the actual effect created by the strikes hasn't come clo…
-
comment
Comment #40315297
The attacker in this case is investing significant resources and the defender isn't investing crazy amounts of resources. I see your point but I don't think the hypothetical as sta…
-
comment
Comment #40315275
I disagree that failing to hit targets is a significant tactical victory. But I agree that they should continue the strike campaign. They can't do much else on the battlefield righ…
-
comment
Comment #40315247
I think the article overstates its premise. The article makes an assumption that Ukraine has out-innovated Russia in terms of drones. That used to be true (in 2022-2023), with Ukra…
-
comment
Comment #40315119
Overall oil refineries are decent targets because they are high cost and statically located and therefore difficult to defend, but Ukraine certainly wishes it had more conventional…
-
comment
Comment #40171986
I clicked through to the article. I think the title is inaccurate. The paper primarily goes into detail about the Department of Defense heavily investing in startups, incubators an…
-
comment
Comment #40101088
Posting from another account (home vs work computer). You can reach me at either. > The US wants to prevent China's rise to global hegemon status. It has no problem with China grow…
-
comment
Comment #38510437
Tesla not only looks at these, they coordinate their fixes and disclosure. Tesla runs a bug bounty program https://bugcrowd.com/tesla , contracts with security research companies t…
-
comment
Comment #38488448
A psychological test to see how strongly the profile matches human emotional-cognition? Can we call it the Voight-Kampff Test?
-
comment
Comment #37708087
Temporary destruction of farmland isn't nearly at the level of a priority as fighting for territorial control of your country. Ukraine has in fact flooded farmland (outside Kiev) a…
-
comment
Comment #37707920
Here are reasons I can think of for either side of the conflict to blow the dam up. We need to note that contextually, the dam was blown up at the start of Ukraine's Counter-Offens…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34744067
I regret that Hersh's reporting relied on anonymous officials. That's not a dig on Hersh - this is the standard for journalism on these topics. As a standard it creates a deniabili…
-
comment
Comment #34089705
I agree with the point about unlimited and undetectable. I think there's nuance to low latency. Here the latency the attacker is limited by the amount of parallelism they can bring…
-
comment
Comment #34086834
It's a perspective difference. Each individual user perspective: "It is possible I can shoot myself in the foot, and also possible I will not. It is not correct to say I will shoot…
-
comment
Comment #34086768
At this point I can not edit the top comment. I would have edited with something like: "this property is not an implementation bug but a design outcome shared with any deployment o…
-
comment
Comment #34085817
mprime1 feel free to use or alter any of the content you agree with to update the documentation for your project.
-
comment
Comment #34085518
I disagree with your speculation as to what most cryptographers think. Are you basing this on any data you can share? Please also see the other thread about how this secret storage…
-
comment
Comment #34085448
I really do hear what you're saying and think you're making a great point. The part that I think applies is that this is a "data at rest protocol". Communication protocols are assu…