Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — craffel

craffel

HN member
Joined
Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 4:47 AM UTC
HN karma
118
Public activity
15 items

About craffel

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #28906801

    (different author, not Stella) To your first question: Unpublished experiments done by the BigScience architecture and scaling WG suggest that training on book corpus yields a boos…

  3. comment
    Comment #28906197

    (author here) The paper/model/code was just made public today. This may be why no one is talking about it yet. Regarding whether the size is a hassle: It's possible to run inferenc…

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #22409975

    Yes, that's me! Sorry if I'm being overeager, I like talking about my research!

  6. comment
    Comment #22409903

    Agreed! The interesting thing is that basic unsupervised pre-training seems to produce a model which functions not only as a knowledge base but also an NLU system which can effecti…

  7. comment
    Comment #22409653

    It's slightly more than that -- it also involves lowercasing and removing articles before testing for string equality.

  8. comment
    Comment #22409275

    We include MASS in our empirical survey (see e.g. section 3.3.2 of our paper, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.10683.pdf ). FWIW, people were pre-training Transformers before MASS, e.g. …

  9. comment
    Comment #22409045

    The blogpost has a summary of our paper from October (a bit late, sorry!) but also has some (fun?) new results on closed-book question answering and fill-in-the-blank text generati…

  10. comment
    Comment #22409035

    Thanks, fixed!

  11. comment
    Comment #22409033

    Yes, unfortunately we have to rely on the very brittle "exact match" method of evaluating whether an answer is correct. FWIW and perhaps surprisingly, this is the primary way quest…

  12. comment
    Comment #21355198

    It actually can be more pernicious than that: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08232 However note that the dataset used to train GPT-2 is about 20x smaller than C4. I'm not 100% sure how…

  13. comment
    Comment #21355133

    To be clear, here is the claim we make in the paper (we did not write the title of this post to HN): > For SuperGLUE, we improved upon the state-of-the-art by a large margin (from …

  14. comment
    Comment #21352104

    Hi, one of the paper authors here. Indeed this is a good question. A couple of comments: - Common Crawl overall is a sparse web dump, it is unlikely that the month we used includes…

  15. comment
    Comment #21351989

    Hi, one of the paper's authors here. We didn't submit our model's predictions for the AX-b task yet, we just copied over the predictions from the example submission. We will submit…