Viewing profile — cpx86
cpx86
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 02, 2017, 11:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 19
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cpx86
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47752950
What if he starts sending his AI clone to the board meetings and it votes to fire him and replace him with itself? :P
-
comment
Comment #47520897
Oh absolutely, I would welcome some way of sponsoring such projects in general. I just meant to highlight that for this particular feature and project, there is already a form of s…
-
comment
Comment #47519742
When it comes to Wine, aren't they already doing this? Steam develops Proton in cooperation with CodeWeavers, who are the main sponsors of Wine, and parts of that work is upstreame…
-
comment
Comment #38974081
That is an interesting argument. Do you believe that the same would apply to humans? I.e. if someone wishes to minimize the suffering of humans, is the logical conclusion that they…
-
comment
Comment #38500652
FWIW the "Why?" page does a good job (IMHO) of what it is and what it's trying to achieve. Well-written, although perhaps not exactly concise. https://docs.endatabas.com/appendix/w…
-
comment
Comment #28235533
Oh that one - yeah I've always steered clear of DataContractJsonSerializer. Never understood why they did it so weird. To be fair, RFC 3339 wasn't even published back when this cla…
-
comment
Comment #28226634
> That's why Microsoft got away with proprietary date formats in System.Text.Json. What's proprietary in it? It follows ISO 8601-1:2019 and RFC 3339 according to the docs.
-
comment
Comment #23154548
This is just my very personal and subjective experience, which may or may not apply to your working environment since I've no idea how many developers or teams you have or how your…
-
comment
Comment #22908152
Exactly this. Treat the DB schema as you would any typical API schema. A lot of the techniques used for evolving application APIs can be used for sprocs and views as well, e.g. ver…
-
comment
Comment #21937893
> You'll spend more time & money on the OpEx cost with Kafka than picking up the client library for Pulsar. Could you elaborate why this would be the case?
-
comment
Comment #21400720
C# didn't either, it was introduced in C#/.NET 2.0. As I've understood it, Java chose type erasure to stay backwards compatible with older JDK versions, whereas .NET instead chose …
-
comment
Comment #18865660
One thing I think is worth considering is why you enjoyed coding to begin with? For some developers it seems to be the craft itself that gives them enjoyment, but IME they are rela…
-
comment
Comment #18777986
I would expect to see at least some legal judgement against dark UX patterns. I was quite heavily involved on the technical side in GDPR compliance (EU company) and my understandin…
-
comment
Comment #15412340
I can never resist naming Assembly variables ass. Also leads to lots of fun variations: dynamicAss, assBuilder, assTypes, ...
-
comment
Comment #14856570
One big challenge I've found is the balance between standardization vs autonomy. E.g. monitoring, log formats, deployment, service discovery, etc are things that can benefit from b…