Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cpan22

cpan22

HN member
Joined
Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 6:36 PM UTC
HN karma
58
Public activity
38 items

About cpan22

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48239050

    I switched over to Superset from Conductor a few months ago and haven't looked back - it's really nice to be able to use the native Codex/Claude Code TUIs without any of the bloat …

  2. comment
    Comment #48056175

    +1, git diffs show you the changes in repository list order but sometimes it makes more sense to read certain things first - our tool does just that

  3. comment
    Comment #48056147

    Nope! this is completely free :)

  4. comment
    Comment #48054106

    yes! we've found that reading changes this way make it very easy to separate the important stuff from the unimportant stuff, and we're thinking of ways to make that more visible in…

  5. comment
    Comment #48053885

    yep sorry about that, we weren't exactly sure what the best framing was glad you like the idea though! let us know what you think

  6. comment
    Comment #48053119

    we're planning on adding it!

  7. comment
    Comment #48052777

    Great let us know what you think! And yeah, I think number 5 on your list is particularly interesting - juniors will develop much slower if they don't go through the struggle of un…

  8. story
    Show HN: Stage CLI – An easier way of reading your AI generated changes locally

    Hey HN! We're Charles and Dean. A few weeks ago we posted about Stage, a code review tool that guides you through reading a PR step by step - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…

  9. comment
    Comment #47976536

    Well I think the bigger issue here is that GitHub is too decoupled from an issue tracking system - its a lot of manual overhead to constantly have to keep in sync. Linear does an o…

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #47837781

    Yeah we've been thinking a lot about this! Switching back and forth between local and GitHub is also a frustration of ours so we want to think of ways to unify the experience

  12. comment
    Comment #47825812

    Good question, we're more focused on the first aspect you mentioned of "does the code you wrote make sense on a high level" rather than "did you miss something" - I think tools lik…

  13. comment
    Comment #47818579

    Great point and that's our takeaway too from talking to many users. We're exploring ways for Stage to possibly tailor the review flow to each specific PR/user preferences. Would lo…

  14. comment
    Comment #47818538

    Yep that seems to be a common sentiment! Definitely some interesting areas around capturing agent conversations in commit history that could make this possible

  15. comment
    Comment #47818512

    Good point, we've heard from users that there's a lot of fatigue of switching between local and GitHub all the time so we're thinking of ways to unify that experience

  16. comment
    Comment #47818461

    Agreed! That's why we designed Stage with the intention of AI guiding the human, not replacing them

  17. comment
    Comment #47812080

    Thanks for sharing this, I do agree with a lot of what you said especially around trust around what its actually telling you For me, I only run into problems of an agent misleading…

  18. comment
    Comment #47810414

    I agree with that - with Stage we're not trying to replace reading code with AI summaries, but rather guiding the reviewer through reading code in the way that makes most sense and…

  19. comment
    Comment #47810045

    Sorry to hear that! Looking into it

  20. comment
    Comment #47809504

    Totally fair, we're working on it!

  21. comment
    Comment #47809371

    Totally get that, still something we're actively talking about! Sort of related to that, we've been thinking a lot about the future of code review for OSS. Its clear with Cal.com g…

  22. comment
    Comment #47809279

    Yep! Or Linear, etc Or could be something like git-ai which captures agent context in git commits

  23. comment
    Comment #47809272

    Yep, for me personally, code review was the most effective way for me to get up to speed when joining a new engineering team

  24. comment
    Comment #47809223

    Yeah this is a really interesting perspective! We've wondered about what the review experience should look like for newly technical or non-technical people now that they are increa…

  25. comment
    Comment #47808966

    No worries at all, that's a very fair point and a question we've gotten a lot! I think our perspective is that: software design has always had a subjective element to it. There's n…