Viewing profile — cowboyd
cowboyd
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 15, 2014, 4:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 4
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cowboyd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47680369
I think writing an effect library yourself is a tough ask, but some of them have gotten really, really good. And they get you things that are simply not possible with promise. Chec…
-
comment
Comment #47679629
Is it safe to just "stop calling next() on a generator?" like the post suggest? To me that sounds like dropping the task on the floor. Specifically, this will not invoke any finall…
-
comment
Comment #40268868
JavaScript generators are unmined gold! We've done a lot of usage of JavaScript generators as delimited continuations; using them to implement the classic shift/reset operations in…
-
comment
Comment #39563993
> yes but what do I say to my colleagues when they realize they need to learn generators (it's a non-trivial hurdle for many people) Just tell them that they already know them. `yi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #38604685
JavaScript’s async/await constructs have a critical lack of power which makes them unsuitable to implement structured concurrency.
- story
-
comment
Comment #30751942
For those interested in exploring Structured Concurrency in JavaScript, there is https://frontside.com/effection
-
comment
Comment #30751892
I think the simplest expression of the idea of structured concurrency that I've come across is this: The scope of any concurrent process is the same as the lexical scope of the fun…
-
comment
Comment #29316247
> I'm not sure I buy the premise for the library's existence, at least with how the author describes it. Just do a google search for "structured concurrency". These ideas did not c…