Viewing profile — costan
costan
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 07, 2009, 2:53 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 216
- Public activity
- 76 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About costan
Thanks to Paul Graham's essays, Ruby, and Rails, he re-discovered the joy of coding, and came back from the dark ways of management. Nowadays, Victor is still crazy about building software that he can impress his friends with, but he also dreams of contributing to making coding even more enjoyable. Victor likes developing mobile and Web 2.0 applications, and occasionally enjoys building some distributed systems behind the apps.
When he is not coding, you will most likely find him reading up on some new programming language or software development technique. At times, Victor likes to pretend he's mentally sane, and can be seen catching up with friends, watching a movie, or exploring Boston.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/pwnall; my proof: https://keybase.io/pwnall/sigs/I1Vine_PdNepU6Sn-s9TOSooWaVBmAzUVlm_OVuOM0A ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #11019229
Thank you very much for this feedback! Re: 1 - I re-read the relevant SDM sections, and saw that there is no requirement that the new upgrade version exceeds the current microcode …
-
comment
Comment #11010867
SGX serves a good purpose, at least in theory. Many people, myself included, wanted it to turn out to be good. So, I don't think many Intel folks objected to it. Instead, I think t…
-
comment
Comment #11010719
But enclaves are worthless without attestation. If the OS is evil and you don't do attestation, it can emulate SGX and run your code in a simulated enclave environment where EGETKE…
-
comment
Comment #11010231
Do you happen to know if the Launch Enclave has the debug flag set? If so, you can't use it to launch production enclaves.
-
comment
Comment #11010218
There's some support in Intel's Management Engine for DRM, called Intel Insider (the successor of PAVP). One of the SGX papers mentions plans for hooking up SGX enclaves with PAVP.…
-
comment
Comment #11010190
TXT requires an ACM, which is essentially a small signed BIOS subset. At least ACMs are freely downloadable from Intel, and they don't look into what you'd like to run under TXT. h…
-
comment
Comment #11010162
It gives Intel control over developers. In general, a computer will execute what you ask it to. SGX will not let you run production enclaves without Intel's permission. This is lik…
-
comment
Comment #11010154
Sadly, leaking the key is not the answer. You'd give independent developers the freedom to use SGX, but at the same you'd make SGX worthless. Details: if the key used to sign archi…
-
comment
Comment #11010140
I expect this to play out like the W3C EME standard. Software attestation separates debug from non-debug enclaves, so your kernel will need to load production enclaves for you to w…
-
comment
Comment #11010131
Perhaps it means they're trying to be thorough? A Xeon implementation would have to secure the QPI links between the CPU chips. These run at significantly higher speeds than DRAM, …
-
comment
Comment #11008131
I'm terrible at writing. I am trying to say that SGX cannot restore things from the SSA, and it has to use some protected area. To the best of my knowledge, they're using the non-a…
-
comment
Comment #11008114
If SGX becomes successful, Intel becomes the Verizon+ATT+Tmobile+Sprint of hardware security. No signed enclave, no security.
- story
-
comment
Comment #4473211
Thanks! Platform for 6.470 day 1? (html / css / js)
-
comment
Comment #4463183
I can't promise anything, but I can assure you that we're well-aware of the pains of the current authentication model.
- story
-
comment
Comment #3719224
Did you try using Prey? Do you know when and how is the GPS used?
-
comment
Comment #2579346
Flashed the Insyde BIOS using http://hexxeh.net/?p=328117655 and got Ubuntu 11.04 at it, when it was just an alpha. Filing bugs since. Will switch to the 11.10 dev version when the…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1412960
I wouldn't expect performance to be a problem. For computational tasks, Ruby works just as fine on Windows as on a UNIX platform. Windows perf suffers because (1) in some rare case…
-
comment
Comment #1406276
Censorship is horrible. But if you think it's restricted to China... think about what would happen if 10,000 people would tweet something sensitive on 9/11. My guess is something a…
-
comment
Comment #1404674
Spam-following people on twitter to promote your app: bad idea. I reported you as a spammer.
-
comment
Comment #1236674
I like the nice succinct description of claims. Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #1045399
Zipped source code: http://6.470.scripts.mit.edu/lectures/security/security_in_w... Live source code: http://github.com/costan/security_in_webapps_slides
- story