Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — corethree

corethree

HN member
Joined
Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 12:30 PM UTC
HN karma
355
Public activity
1,145 items

About corethree

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #39661232

    This is a rarity. Many interviewers are so biased and lack nuance that they literally just go with whether or not the person passed the question.

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #39353307

    No way. The people at the forefront of AI, most of them will have a much harder time learning quantum physics. Yes ML is hard but it's nowhere near QE, theoretical math or physics.…

  4. comment
    Comment #39353253

    And You're fucking rude. What the hell is up with that Wild u turn there into hostility. You need to fucking tone your shit down. This is causal conversation not a scientifically r…

  5. comment
    Comment #39349376

    Just thought I reference this: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human bein…

  6. comment
    Comment #39349345

    I don't think he undertands people are more and more hating CA, both inside and outside of the state.

  7. comment
    Comment #39349333

    Same reason why Tesla moved and why tons of people are moving out of CA. There's a huge benefit. Also don't think that this workforce is exclusive to CA. AI is easy to learn, it's …

  8. comment
    Comment #39347819

    Of course it's nicer to give everyone a humane job. It's not about what's nicer. It's about reality. There's simply not enough jobs to go around if there are no bullshit jobs. Your…

  9. comment
    Comment #39344994

    If you want to create a world where there's no bullshit jobs at all then you'd be creating a world where millions are unemployed. We are rapidly heading in this direction with auto…

  10. comment
    Comment #39337989

    Does anyone know what I have to learn to "know" about this theory? Is it control theory and classical mechanics?

  11. comment
    Comment #39337310

    Is there a way to model this theoretically? Or is it always trial and error? I mean I realize you have to test the thing for "bugs" just wondering if a theory to perfectly model it…

  12. comment
    Comment #39336586

    I disagree. The colloquial understanding for logic is technical. OP is using the term incorrectly and in a strange way. I understand that most of us can still 'understand' his poin…

  13. comment
    Comment #39336470

    I'm kidding a bit here. My post is actually agreeing with the parent poster but in a sort of roundabout deceptive way of appearing to disagree. It got flagged and several downvotes…

  14. comment
    Comment #39336371

    >FWIW, I'm amused because I recognize your behavior as that of someone quite young. I acted similar ways 20 years ago and now I think it's just kind of funny to see in other people…

  15. comment
    Comment #39336213

    Right. So that's my point. Css is logical. The point made by the article has no point. A claim that css is terrible, has a point.

  16. comment
    Comment #39335037

    Logical is orthogonal to terrible. Literally by definition anything designed in a computer must follow logic.

  17. comment
    Comment #39335033

    [flagged]

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #39332526

    [flagged]

  20. comment
    Comment #39331158

    You called me adorable, you laugh in my face and make dismissive comments. These words are stated by you to start a fucking war. Any reasonable person can see this. And your counte…

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #39324662

    >So what? I said you were perpetuating a myth and you were. It still not 'your' thread, what kind of childish nonsense is that? Please do not say things like that here. It is "my" …

  23. comment
    Comment #39323030

    But you're talking shit about me under my thread which my comment is the parent to my face. You're starting shit. I've literally told you I don't appreciate your attitude and you'r…

  24. comment
    Comment #39321381

    Please don't respond to my thread nor impolitely reference me or accuse me of things if you're going to post things that aren't for me. I already stated this conversation is over. …

  25. comment
    Comment #39320402

    Thank you for posting sources, you should have done this in the beginning. Unfortunately I don't like your attitude nor do I care about this topic enough to follow through. No offe…