Viewing profile — corethree
corethree
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 12:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 355
- Public activity
- 1,145 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About corethree
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39661232
This is a rarity. Many interviewers are so biased and lack nuance that they literally just go with whether or not the person passed the question.
-
comment
Comment #39543005
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #39353307
No way. The people at the forefront of AI, most of them will have a much harder time learning quantum physics. Yes ML is hard but it's nowhere near QE, theoretical math or physics.…
-
comment
Comment #39353253
And You're fucking rude. What the hell is up with that Wild u turn there into hostility. You need to fucking tone your shit down. This is causal conversation not a scientifically r…
-
comment
Comment #39349376
Just thought I reference this: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human bein…
-
comment
Comment #39349345
I don't think he undertands people are more and more hating CA, both inside and outside of the state.
-
comment
Comment #39349333
Same reason why Tesla moved and why tons of people are moving out of CA. There's a huge benefit. Also don't think that this workforce is exclusive to CA. AI is easy to learn, it's …
-
comment
Comment #39347819
Of course it's nicer to give everyone a humane job. It's not about what's nicer. It's about reality. There's simply not enough jobs to go around if there are no bullshit jobs. Your…
-
comment
Comment #39344994
If you want to create a world where there's no bullshit jobs at all then you'd be creating a world where millions are unemployed. We are rapidly heading in this direction with auto…
-
comment
Comment #39337989
Does anyone know what I have to learn to "know" about this theory? Is it control theory and classical mechanics?
-
comment
Comment #39337310
Is there a way to model this theoretically? Or is it always trial and error? I mean I realize you have to test the thing for "bugs" just wondering if a theory to perfectly model it…
-
comment
Comment #39336586
I disagree. The colloquial understanding for logic is technical. OP is using the term incorrectly and in a strange way. I understand that most of us can still 'understand' his poin…
-
comment
Comment #39336470
I'm kidding a bit here. My post is actually agreeing with the parent poster but in a sort of roundabout deceptive way of appearing to disagree. It got flagged and several downvotes…
-
comment
Comment #39336371
>FWIW, I'm amused because I recognize your behavior as that of someone quite young. I acted similar ways 20 years ago and now I think it's just kind of funny to see in other people…
-
comment
Comment #39336213
Right. So that's my point. Css is logical. The point made by the article has no point. A claim that css is terrible, has a point.
-
comment
Comment #39335037
Logical is orthogonal to terrible. Literally by definition anything designed in a computer must follow logic.
-
comment
Comment #39335033
[flagged]
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39332526
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #39331158
You called me adorable, you laugh in my face and make dismissive comments. These words are stated by you to start a fucking war. Any reasonable person can see this. And your counte…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39324662
>So what? I said you were perpetuating a myth and you were. It still not 'your' thread, what kind of childish nonsense is that? Please do not say things like that here. It is "my" …
-
comment
Comment #39323030
But you're talking shit about me under my thread which my comment is the parent to my face. You're starting shit. I've literally told you I don't appreciate your attitude and you'r…
-
comment
Comment #39321381
Please don't respond to my thread nor impolitely reference me or accuse me of things if you're going to post things that aren't for me. I already stated this conversation is over. …
-
comment
Comment #39320402
Thank you for posting sources, you should have done this in the beginning. Unfortunately I don't like your attitude nor do I care about this topic enough to follow through. No offe…