Viewing profile — coolgod
coolgod
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 06, 2020, 11:24 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 51
- Public activity
- 59 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About coolgod
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25788109
I don't see the irony, I'm just more knowledgable about Chinese literature so I gave an example of how biased the list is using its lack of Chinese literature. I am fully aware tha…
-
comment
Comment #25787667
Your suggestion for naming would be more accurate and I would be fine with it. However, besides the naming, this list shows how shallow western reviewers are as greatest book lists…
-
comment
Comment #25787474
For example, the top 350 books doesn't include a single Chinese book! This is enough to shows you how biased and worthless this list is. It's essentially suggesting there is no lit…
-
comment
Comment #25710607
Who are terrorists? Foreigners the US government doesn't like? Who are domestic terrorists? Citizens the ruling faction doesn't like? Founding fathers must have been a bunch of ter…
-
comment
Comment #25696820
He needs to start a Radio Free America to save his legacy.
-
comment
Comment #25696411
Who is "We"? Why do you assume HN users aren't Trump supporters? Many people see this from a totally different perspective. In most countries, these recent events would be called a…
-
comment
Comment #25692894
Yup, everypage is super slow.
-
comment
Comment #25667580
American citizens can't even enter their own house now?
-
comment
Comment #25643715
Just think about how easy it is to make deep fakes with this.
-
comment
Comment #25643073
Wow! Another propaganda piece which repeat same falsehoods about COVID origins from China without providing meaningful substance. It's from the NYTimes too, a reputable fake news s…
-
comment
Comment #25642761
While we're discussing racist coronavirus conspiracies which can't explain the positive COVID results of Italian and French patients in November 2019, why don't we go all the way i…
-
comment
Comment #25642487
Wow, I guess CIA only needs pay for two pieces to convince you of the Truth™.
-
comment
Comment #25640093
This is a valid possibility, interesting to see such double standards applied to different tech companies based on the residence of their HQ.
-
comment
Comment #25628644
http://britneyspears.ac/physics/basics/basics.htm My prof showed a slideshow in class that included the band diagram photo, which definitely piqued my interest. I think its just an…
-
comment
Comment #25624936
How do you know Taiwan doesn't have malicious state actors behind these backdoors? Is it because they aren't in a China ruled by the evil CCP?
-
comment
Comment #25605285
> No company can make the 5nm litho systems today, and catching up with the decades of R&D they've invested is not feasible. They are the greatest achievement of science and techno…
-
comment
Comment #25549298
I only found this https://twitter.com/iamforrest_/status/1342580703440084994
-
comment
Comment #25546679
https://twitter.com/intheMatrixxx/status/1342919849509597185... Explain this video without resorting to false flag please.
-
comment
Comment #25504193
Can't believe this simple method hasn't been tried before.
-
comment
Comment #25503577
Where is the lie?
-
comment
Comment #25492391
This is like a standard university press statement for a standard high quality experimental article. It seems like the researchers have more experimental evidence of topological ph…
-
comment
Comment #25483679
Yes just like all the "anonymous sources" commonly cited in the news.
-
comment
Comment #25481668
That's just fancy technical terms to justify the propaganda. If these kinds of "hard proof" which definitively link hacks to nation state actors exist, why are they never publicall…
-
comment
Comment #25473704
It's gotten so bad that I actively avoid clicking any HN links with possible connections to China since I know a large portion of the comments will contain nonrelevant arguments al…
-
comment
Comment #25464426
How come this community of self-proclaimed hackers and independent thinkers are so quick to believe whatever "cyber-attack" related news that gets published?