Viewing profile — cool_hw
cool_hw
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 29, 2022, 3:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 104
- Public activity
- 39 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cool_hw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33045702
I did a quick search earlier and it seems these are informational only and not necessarily persistent warnings. Some discussion suggested that some unsupported requests to the disk…
-
comment
Comment #33041747
------- vim/vim is licensed under the Vim License There are no restrictions on using or distributing an unmodified copy of the software. Parts of the software may also be distribut…
-
comment
Comment #33038152
fzf.vim works better, in my subjective opinion, but I haven't configured telescope a lot.
-
comment
Comment #33038050
Treesitter integration is a bit easier in neovim IMHO (but I haven't tried to make it work with vim too much.) Newer plugin development seems to be much more on the nvim side than …
-
comment
Comment #33037739
This is exactly the kind of comparison that prompted me to post this topic. I suppose macOS just uses the SSD far more.
-
comment
Comment #33037707
How does your workload look?
-
comment
Comment #33036508
Thanks.
-
comment
Comment #33035427
Thanks for sharing, is this a 1TB drive? Going by the percentage used, looks like an expected lifespan of 1200TBW.
-
comment
Comment #33035348
Power On Hours seem to indicate the disk has been on for a good chunk of time, so I would think you're doing fine. Percentage used says 6%, so that seems decent too. What model SSD…
-
comment
Comment #33035324
I think most folks will.
-
comment
Comment #33035299
What is your RAM/SSD config?
-
comment
Comment #33035151
This is why I asked here. Most folks don't seem to mind it, but it is an order of magnitude, if not more, higher disk usage than linux.
-
comment
Comment #33034484
Is there a noticeable difference in battery life usage with option 1?
-
comment
Comment #33033993
I think that's because `power on` hours is talking about the disk being in the power on state, not the rest of the machine.
-
comment
Comment #33033608
Wow, that's a well used machine!
-
comment
Comment #33033602
> Addendum. I just wrote 1.7GB in the last 30mins while reading HN on Firefox, and a few other web pages. Thanks for sharing this. I need to see if linux does this.
-
comment
Comment #33033584
Is there a way to look up that error log?
-
comment
Comment #33033576
Perhaps one day when Apple prices the RAM upgrades reasonably..
-
comment
Comment #33033567
Thank you for the data point, and your usage on an M1 will probably yield crazier numbers. This is why I asked, Apple silicon machines look like they're using the disk far more tha…
-
comment
Comment #33033560
I noticed that on my linux machine the available spare threshold number is 10% too. Thank you for posting, this (and the sibling posts and some google searching) confirms to me tha…
-
comment
Comment #33033548
Indeed, I intended to say letting it get to standby. :)
-
comment
Comment #33033545
Thank you, this is useful. I think I'm going to try the memory only option. Your Read/Writes seem lower than others (still pretty high, but much better than other Apple Silicon)
-
comment
Comment #33028545
I'm doing none of that on this machine yet. In generak, it can reach it easily on a dev machine, but it seems like the norm. And my linux experience is at 1/5th or 1/10th the amoun…
-
comment
Comment #33028476
> 1.31 PB Wow, that's a large number.
-
comment
Comment #33027905
The two relatively lower posts I've seen here are both higher RAM, 32GB and 64GB. I wonder there's anything to read into this.