Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — colah3

colah3

HN member
Joined
Fri, Oct 10, 2014, 4:02 PM UTC
HN karma
1,213
Public activity
159 items

About colah3

I want to understand things clearly and explain them well.

http://distill.pub http://colah.github.io

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45754465

    (Disclaimer: I work on interpretability at Anthropic.) I wanted to flag that this is an accessible blog post and that there's a link to the paper ( https://transformer-circuits.pub…

  2. comment
    Comment #45280275

    Hi! I'm the research lead for Anthropic's interpretability team, and was the decision maker for us publishing our papers web first and not doing traditional publications. A few tho…

  3. comment
    Comment #44047036

    See https://transformer-circuits.pub/2022/toy_model/index.html#m... If you're new to this, I'd mostly just look at all the empirical examples. The slightly harder thing is to consi…

  4. comment
    Comment #44046199

    It's a bit different than what's discussed here, but color-contrast detectors in neural networks can be thought of as forming a Klein bottle: https://distill.pub/2020/circuits/equi…

  5. comment
    Comment #44044814

    I guess I'll plug my hobby horse: The whole discourse of "stochastic parrots" and "do models understand" and so on is deeply unhealthy because it should be scientific questions abo…

  6. comment
    Comment #44044750

    > True! I suppose I was thinking about a 'strong' form of linear representations, which is something like: features are represented by linear combinations of neurons that display t…

  7. comment
    Comment #44044239

    If you like symmetry, you might enjoy how symmetry falls out of circuit analysis of conv nets here: https://distill.pub/2020/circuits/equivariance/

  8. comment
    Comment #44044229

    > Circuits I find less compelling, since the analysis there feels very tied to the transformer architecture in specific, but what do I know. I don't think circuits is specific to t…

  9. comment
    Comment #44043415

    Since this post is based on my 2014 blog post ( https://colah.github.io/posts/2014-03-NN-Manifolds-Topology/ ), I thought I might comment. I tried really hard to use topology as a …

  10. comment
    Comment #43833214

    A few comments on this thread: Gwern is correct in his prior quote of how long these articles took. I think 50-200 hours is a pretty good range. I expect AI assistants could help q…

  11. comment
    Comment #43501299

    Yep, that’s right! If you want to be precise, there are “autoregressive transformers” and “bidirectional transformers”. Bidirectional is a lot more common in vision. In language mo…

  12. comment
    Comment #43499989

    Thanks for the great questions! I've been responding to this thread for the last few hours and I'm about to need to run, so I hope you'll forgive me redirecting you to some of the …

  13. comment
    Comment #43499878

    Thanks for the feedback! I'm one of the authors. I just wanted to make sure you noticed that this is linking to an accessible blog post that's trying to communicate a research resu…

  14. comment
    Comment #43499819

    > The obvious way to deal with this would be to send forward some of the internal activations as well as the generated words in the autoregressive chain. Hi! I lead interpretabilit…

  15. comment
    Comment #43499750

    Hi! I'm one of the authors. There certainly are many interesting parallels here. I often think about this from the perspective of systems biology, in Uri Alon's tradition. There ar…

  16. comment
    Comment #43499683

    Features correspond to vectors in activation space. So you can just do vector arithmetic! If you aren't familiar with thinking about features, you might find it helpful to look at …

  17. comment
    Comment #43499671

    I think the question is: by what mechanism does it adjust up the probability of the token "an"? Of course, the reason it has learned to do this is that it saw this in training data…

  18. comment
    Comment #43499484

    Just to be clear, the probability for "An" is high, just based on the prefix. You don't need to do beam search.

  19. comment
    Comment #43499457

    The planning is certainly performed by circuits which we learned during training. I'd expect that, just like in the multi-step planning example, there are lots of places where the …

  20. comment
    Comment #43497760

    I used the astronomer example earlier as the most simple, minimal version of something you might think of as a kind of microscopic form of "planning", but I think that at this poin…

  21. comment
    Comment #43497016

    "An astronomer" is two tokens, which is the relevant concern when people worry about this.

  22. comment
    Comment #43497010

    Yes, there are two kinds of evidence. Firstly, there is behavioral evidence. This is, to me, the less compelling kind. But it's important to understand. You are of course correct t…

  23. comment
    Comment #43496651

    Hi! I lead interpretability research at Anthropic. I also used to do a lot of basic ML pedagogy ( https://colah.github.io/ ). I think this post and its children have some important…

  24. comment
    Comment #40606195

    I'm the research lead of Anthropic's interpretability team. I've seen some comments like this one, which I worry downplay the importance of @leogao et al's paper due to the similar…

  25. comment
    Comment #34267125

    I'm glad you've found it easy to follow! My best guess at the middle regime is that there are _empirical correlations between features_ due to the limited data. That is, even thoug…