Viewing profile — coherentpony
coherentpony
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Mar 30, 2013, 4:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,352
- Public activity
- 920 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About coherentpony
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48623674
My employer is counting token usage, so explaining my project between tokens isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I am clearly a more productive engineer because of it \end{sarcasm}
-
comment
Comment #48579094
Uber’s situation was different, though. The reason Uber were bleeding money is because they purposefully made all their rides cheap to undercut the taxi businesses. People used Ube…
-
comment
Comment #48523649
If your comment is intended to convey sympathy on these workers, I think you're going to have a difficult time finding folks that align with you. If your comment is intended to rem…
-
comment
Comment #48129782
> The task is to place four black queens and one black bishop on the chessboard so that there is no square not under their attack > In other words, after arranging the five black p…
-
comment
Comment #47996944
You can saturate the entire power budget on pretty much all GPUs just by moving data in and out of HBM. There is no compute needed at all to do this, and bandwidth bound workloads …
-
comment
Comment #47993217
Is it? Nobody else can really build on their work.
- story
-
comment
Comment #47554187
I am somewhat cynically waiting for the AI community to rediscover the last half a century of linear algebra and optimisation techniques. At some point someone will realise that ba…
-
comment
Comment #47298179
It doesn’t work per-song. Songs have multiple chords, some even with alterations. If you tune an E so that it is perfectly a major third above C, then that E won’t be a perfect fif…
-
comment
Comment #46841938
I’m trying to make sense of this question. GEMMs are dense O(N^3) work operations that have roughly the same access pattern and data reuse properties across all matrices. Of course…
-
comment
Comment #46459867
Ah yes I forgot about that. Thanks for the correction.
-
comment
Comment #46459855
> Personally I have a bunch of machines dedicated to gaming in my house ( https://lanparty.house ) Woah, that is extremely cool. Very nice work, sir.
-
comment
Comment #46446493
The circumference of Earth at the equator is about 40,000 km and the speed of light is about 300,000 km/s. The appropriate division results in about 0.13 s. That seems to track. Th…
-
comment
Comment #46213011
Ok that helps. Thank you.
-
comment
Comment #46187406
I don’t understand what the visualisation screenshot in the README is trying to communicate to me.
-
comment
Comment #46070134
It’s a natural observation, but it doesn’t address the floating point problem. I think the author should have said “fast or would accumulate floating point error” instead of “fast …
-
comment
Comment #45868065
What a wonderful comment. It was educational and friendly without holding my hand too much. Thank you.
-
comment
Comment #45516516
You originally called someone a redditor making a cringe joke for highlighting a serious historical problem. It wasn't clear to me that it was a joke at all, but my impression is t…
-
comment
Comment #45516321
> Texas loses power one time for a week and the redditors will never let it go. Wild how this is still a cringe joke so many years later. Texas had the most number of power outages…
-
comment
Comment #45414515
Not totally orthogonal, and quite interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6723
-
comment
Comment #45297169
> For example, ChatGPT is even more aligned with Japan than with the US I have no expertise in this field. Is it actually even more aligned? Or is it simply aligned with the elemen…
-
comment
Comment #45231822
Honestly, I didn’t realise it was an advert until you told me it was.
-
comment
Comment #44895952
The concept exists now. You can "reverse offload" work to the CPU.
-
comment
Comment #44599939
> While true, it also produces a topology that makes you want to throw your PC out the window. Can you elaborate?
-
comment
Comment #44500957
You are the person that made the initial claim. The burden of proof is on you, not someone else.