Viewing profile — coffeemug
coffeemug
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 14, 2007, 10:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 15,972
- Public activity
- 1,466 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About coffeemug
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49076661
A government agency tests all medications, why not models?
-
comment
Comment #49026132
Imagine a model that's 10000x more intelligent than any human. You integrate that model into a sensitive industry. You now effectively have an extremely powerful foreign agent runn…
-
comment
Comment #49026070
I'm not advocating for the policy, I'm just saying that there is a legitimate argument that's not so easy to dismiss. > And you could still ban specific, known malicious models/lab…
-
comment
Comment #49025957
Subsidizing a product to capture market share is very different from exploiting a national security attack vector.
-
comment
Comment #49025938
I am not supposing a low-risk event. This is an obvious attack vector that an adversary would almost certainly exploit. I would exploit it if I were them.
-
comment
Comment #49025648
Suppose a foreign actor deliberately builds an unaligned model, and dumps it at a very low cost through subsidies. Since the cost is lower, everyone integrates it into their busine…
-
comment
Comment #48912115
I disagree with the first part (that this is merely a voice). There is a distinct difference between an author's unique voice and slop. It may be hard to tease out exactly what the…
-
comment
Comment #48874979
Would you feel the same way if he attached good faith probability estimates to those claims?
-
comment
Comment #48852400
As a language Lisp is great (though the ecosystem is limited). It has two flaws-- it's very open-ended so unless you're talented and disciplined you can fall into a rabbit hole of …
-
comment
Comment #48840343
I don’t find Opus to be overly left-leaning. I think it’s generally pretty balanced with a slight lean left, but when pressed it will happily steelman rightwing arguments and opera…
-
comment
Comment #48766655
Not anything. There are domains where precedents empirically don’t balloon and domains where they do. Federal government is nearly always the latter.
-
comment
Comment #48765415
The issues with this are precedent/slippery slope. Today it's a small stake in a small number of companies, but empirically government initiatives almost always grow. Once entrench…
-
comment
Comment #48702884
When I was lifting weights I went from 170lbs to 210, and back to 170. Doing that isn’t technically hard, and maintaining is even easier. But I had to think about it _all_ the time…
-
comment
Comment #48693249
Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives. Even firearms, despite a constitutional ame…
-
comment
Comment #48693179
Another plausible future is AI reshuffling the economic hierarchy. In a technological civilization the pressure valve need not be political. As an aside, you made me curious if Tru…
-
comment
Comment #48692513
It depends on whether you believe US action is overdetermined, but I think if Trump didn’t get elected we would have continued on the path of free trade. His election wasn’t predes…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48651823
That’s a very uncharitable way to interpret public opinion. A more charitable way is that people have different ethical intuitions. Some of us lean more utilitarian than others, an…
-
comment
Comment #48530426
“Billionaires v. the underclass” is such an unsophisticated discussion. Markets have all kinds of externalities, equilibrium traps, information asymmetry flywheels, and hundreds of…
-
comment
Comment #48460177
Giving normal people something that has only been available to rich people is a staple of technological innovation. The problem in this case with Siri isn’t that people don’t want …
- story
-
comment
Comment #48360927
Microsoft is no longer rest and vest and hasn’t been for a long time. The expectations and pressure are very high (at least the corner I’m in)
-
comment
Comment #48358803
The balance of power between capital and labor fluctuates; qualitatively it definitely felt different ten years ago. For whatever reason labor seems to have much less power today. …
-
comment
Comment #48358726
Both arguments can be (and are) right at once. What OP said is definitely true on the micro level-- not "even/might/some aspects", but the whole thing. It's true that in any given …
-
comment
Comment #48327599
I think your first equilibrium would be hard, for two reasons. First, empirically insurgencies are extremely difficult to exterminate; over the long run they tend to win. Second, i…