Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — coffeecloud

coffeecloud

HN member
Joined
Thu, Dec 01, 2016, 5:15 PM UTC
HN karma
337
Public activity
61 items

About coffeecloud

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48118427

    Its beautifully written C code. Very readable and grokable.

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #41406226

    > That must be why there were no successful companies in the United States before 1965. Of course there were. There were also lots of successful companies before we had highways or…

  4. comment
    Comment #41404545

    There is a broader definition of "infrastructure." For example, Medicare is infrastructure that is directly related to the success of any company in the United States. Has Tesla ev…

  5. comment
    Comment #41394417

    Yup, the 50% of the population that has managed to extract zero wealth from the system aren’t asked to put very much back in. Makes sense to me.

  6. comment
    Comment #41384932

    Who got more out of the system: someone getting weekly $400 check or someone who has managed to acquire 100M in assets? People on welfare aren’t getting nearly as much out of the s…

  7. comment
    Comment #41376497

    A new type of tax on the absolute wealthiest of the wealthy is not "taxing everyone to death." I'm sure there are some great ways we can reduce/improve government spending, but tha…

  8. comment
    Comment #41376480

    My point was that just because we impose a new tax on unfathomably wealthy people, it doesn't mean that we are inherently going to impose that tax on normal people. We can't be so …

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #41375815

    "Your opinions are completely, totally, objectively false. Here are 3 of my opinions and unsubstantiated conjectures that prove so."

  11. comment
    Comment #41375504

    It’s simply pay for use. The more someone uses the system, the more they pay back into it. Anyone with more than 100M in assets has used the system a shit ton and owes a lot back i…

  12. comment
    Comment #41374346

    We all earned the money. Nobody makes 100M in a vacuum. That sort of profit only comes from taking full advantage of a country's infrastructure, its educated population, its safety…

  13. comment
    Comment #41374300

    Yup I totally agree, because bad things can happen we shouldn't try to do anything. Much simpler.

  14. comment
    Comment #41359739

    What you see on youtube is not what the judge and jury see in court.

  15. comment
    Comment #41352386

    If cops wanted to win the trust of the public and work alongside their fellow citizens to keep their communities safe, they would welcome to use of body cams and hold themselves ac…

  16. comment
    Comment #41296598

    Kudos to Joel for sticking with that obnoxious interviewer.

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #41260190

    To me it sounds like this argument is claiming that "training models" is legally equivalent to "training humans". So are there other examples of a human being allowed to do somethi…

  19. comment
    Comment #41251696

    Oh I found the goto-definition works pretty well in RubyMine. I would imagine goto-definition not working well to be more an issue with Ruby being a dynamically typed language and …

  20. comment
    Comment #41250420

    Read through the Rails docs and you'll learn all the "magic" is pretty easily explainable, mostly just predefined naming conventions and directory structures and a bunch of preconf…

  21. comment
    Comment #41232970

    In 1 year I can stand up a system big enough that it would require 2 engineers to manage its ongoing maintenance, feature requests, bug fixes, 3rd party API updates, etc More softw…

  22. comment
    Comment #41105700

    Then why enforce any laws? Any enforcement is on the same slippery slope. I don’t think slope is nearly as slippery as you claim. There are miles of high friction slope between enf…

  23. comment
    Comment #41105693

    Putting up speeding cameras on public roads is not “unlimited surveillance” or “cameras everywhere”

  24. comment
    Comment #41104548

    Why is the solution to the abuse "don't use traffic cameras" instead of "hold people accountable for shortening yellow lights"?

  25. comment
    Comment #41103855

    What’s the difference between “constantly monitor behavior in order to coerce a desired response” and “enforcing the law”? Are traffic cameras a slippery slope to cameras in your h…