Viewing profile — codesparkle
codesparkle
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 19, 2016, 12:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 349
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About codesparkle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46631188
It’s not so much that AI is replacing “tech writers”; with all due respect to the individuals in those roles, it was never a good title to identify as. Technical writing is part of…
-
comment
Comment #46627065
Previous related discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46586766
- story
-
comment
Comment #46574000
counterpoint: yt-dlp
-
comment
Comment #46092220
What actually happened: The workflow was configured in a way that allowed untrusted code from a branch controlled by the attacker to be executed in the context of a GitHub action w…
-
comment
Comment #46092197
That’s not what happened at all The attacker did not need to merge any PRs to exfiltrate the credentials
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #34287206
cool, there's a brew formula and trying to run it tells me exactly what to do: Error: no URLs configured. Please fill the file ~/.newsboat/urls with RSS feed URLs or import an OPML…
-
comment
Comment #34287126
Nice! I have tried Mastodon but keep getting sucked back into Twitter, hence the 30 minute daily limit. Perhaps I should give RSS a go as well. Can you recommend a reader?
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #25807653
A bad programmer solves their problems inefficiently and a really bad programmer doesn't even know why their solution is inefficient To any beginners reading this: Solving problems…
-
comment
Comment #25236142
From the postmortem: At 9:39 AM PST, we were able to confirm a root cause [...] the new capacity had caused all of the servers in the fleet to exceed the maximum number of threads …
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #19450429
react-router depends on the ReactTraining/history package for browser navigation support. On 10 June 2017, an mind-bogglingly ill-conceived pull request[1] was merged, which causes…
-
comment
Comment #12331049
This is incorrect. The host cannot see your review until they have left you a review and vice versa.