Viewing profile — code-dog

Good point - what is clojure actually for?

... and you have to work really hard to make C or C++ run any faster than the JVM. For all normal levels of programmer effort there is no difference or the JVM is faster.

I see your point, but then money is money. So, why pay MS anything? Why is computing treated in this unique way where minimizing cost is not standard practice?

Oracle moving on from the 1.6 doldrums was a huge plus for Java and the JVM. Now the buzz is around 1.8 with lambdas and enhancements to performance of invoke dynamic.

Makes sense - the JVM is fast and stable. It comes with a huge array of tooling and its own built in debugging system. It is well supported and cross platform. Why would you not wa…

Yes! Someone gets it!

In this case a team could work across the project. One on the parser/lexer one on AST translation, one of code generation, Two on the runtime and 1 on build/ci. I think that makes …

That is true. As someone who thinks both ways (craft and day job) the issue with Scala (that with which I have the most experience) is the tooling.

The JVM has a huge advantage over the CLR in that Mono is nothing like as well supported as Oracle supports the JVM and Microsoft's CLR is Windows only - which makes it far to expe…

No reason it should take that long. The article suggest 6 person years - which could mean 6 people for 1 year.

I would love to see if this is the same on Linux...

I guess that is not the real point of the post. It seems to be more about keeping grounded and not taking 'the buzz' too seriously.

Could not have put it better myself.

I like scala but the compiler is slooooooooow. The tooling needs work before it can be main stream.