Viewing profile — cmpitg
cmpitg
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 30, 2011, 6:35 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 128
- Public activity
- 39 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cmpitg
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
story
SourceForce currently down?
I cannot access it. IsUp.Me seems to agree: http://isup.me/sourceforge.net
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #9953182
This is the exact reason why I keep telling myself to slow down all the time, using pen and paper, drafting the problems and solutions before getting my hands dirty, writing them d…
- story
-
comment
Comment #9819723
And what does it have anything to do with C++ compared to any other language X? The bare-metal characteristics could be created as a subset of any non-safe non-garbage-collected la…
-
comment
Comment #9819040
I agree on the overhead. There are information available only at run-time that could be (and actually has been, in case of interpreter like PicoLisp) used to have better optimizati…
-
comment
Comment #9818977
That said, it's a about the implementation not the language itself. The phrase is technically incorrect, right? One could write a compiler that compiles Python or Ruby down to mach…
-
comment
Comment #9818953
I don't think it has anything to do the relationship between the language and its (compiler/interpreter) performance. Besides, the subset of a large number or programming language …
-
comment
Comment #9818722
I don't think it's fair to separate the code and the software itself. I personally don't feel proud of the result of a piece of software if the code is crappy, i.e. spaghetti code,…
-
comment
Comment #9818676
Perhaps a bit off-topic but serious question. I don't understand whenever someone says language A is next to bare metal? What does a language have anything to do with bare metal or…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #8119321
You might want to combine Geiser with Quack[1] for best result with Scheme. Also, I think it's worth a shot to have a look at the fairly new Racket-mode[2] written by Greg[3]. Geis…
- story
-
comment
Comment #7125493
My bad, you're right. I didn't know the documentation section for macro was added recently. It looks pretty Common Lispy. Reader macro looks nice, still at its beginning stage thou…
-
comment
Comment #7124521
I've been following Hy for a while and it's sad that macros are still part of on-going discussions with no definite plan. It's one of the reason I prefer Scheme-inspired Lisps to C…
-
comment
Comment #6957859
How do you make sure the correctness of the implementations? Shouldn't there be tests?
- story
-
comment
Comment #6674325
Perhaps it should be opt-out?