Viewing profile — cmpctyd
cmpctyd
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 13, 2013, 1:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 19
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cmpctyd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6109666
A normal, non-exit relay node will not be identified as "trafficking in illegal bits" by any sane police force. A normal relay will trade from A to B in only encrypted traffic and …
-
comment
Comment #6108638
I'll throw in another anonymity network (I2P). Its design is similar to Tor, created in 2003 and is mostly interesting due to some of its properties (tunnel based/garlic routing, e…
-
comment
Comment #6108629
Running a relay to help could be a good start. It's pretty simple[0][1]. The risks associated with being a Tor exit node do not apply to all relay types and the network can be help…
-
comment
Comment #6012846
It does not hurt any nodes used for the connection's anonymity, it does hurt their connectivity and performance. Tor nodes are publicly known and are not the same as Tor users. One…
-
comment
Comment #6012570
BitTorrent over I2P exists (and is popular). A torrent client is bundled out of the box. A custom spec exists for this also[1]. As for Tor.. Tor and BitTorrent do not mix; the band…
-
comment
Comment #6008087
Relaying 'existing' traffic is the "random noise". It provides obscure, 'random' traffic between nodes but serves a purpose by providing bandwidth. The content of this traffic coul…
-
comment
Comment #6007653
I2PBote[0]: distributed, p2p, encrypted, anonymous (internal) email. It uses I2P's DHT. [0] http://i2pbote.i2p.us/ (or http://i2pbote.i2p from inside I2P)
-
comment
Comment #6007590
As I understand, modern cryptography is distinguishable from "random". Onion and garlic routing provide more useful and productive ways of reaching the same goal.
-
comment
Comment #6007560
Any cryptographic application could be vulnerable and not "hold up". It is wrong and dangerous to suggest that any program or tool is absolute. A court case in Germany not long ago…
-
comment
Comment #6007536
I2P has been around since 2003, same time period as Tor's beginnings. You can read academic review here which may help answer your question: http://www.i2p2.de/papers.html
-
comment
Comment #6007529
This is already done in a variety of networks for plausible deniability. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorFAQ#DoI... I2P does similar in making every user an in…
-
comment
Comment #5846037
"small systems"; I get that it can be hell-like on very small systems but the Raspberry Pi works great. There's a thread on zzz.i2p about it.
-
comment
Comment #5846035
You can disable/lower routing. There is also bandwidth limiting. I don't recommend disabling the routing entirely, however.
-
story
YouTube spitting out obscure message for all searches
"There may be confidential content in your search results. Please do not share outside Google." shows up on all youtube searches Sample: URL: https://www.youtube.com/results?search…
-
comment
Comment #5313424
VPNs are constantly being mentioned as a solution to companies, governments, etc attacking privacy but it's extremely easy to make a bad choice and end up with more than you bargai…