Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cmpctyd

cmpctyd

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 13, 2013, 1:41 AM UTC
HN karma
19
Public activity
15 items

About cmpctyd

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #6109666

    A normal, non-exit relay node will not be identified as "trafficking in illegal bits" by any sane police force. A normal relay will trade from A to B in only encrypted traffic and …

  2. comment
    Comment #6108638

    I'll throw in another anonymity network (I2P). Its design is similar to Tor, created in 2003 and is mostly interesting due to some of its properties (tunnel based/garlic routing, e…

  3. comment
    Comment #6108629

    Running a relay to help could be a good start. It's pretty simple[0][1]. The risks associated with being a Tor exit node do not apply to all relay types and the network can be help…

  4. comment
    Comment #6012846

    It does not hurt any nodes used for the connection's anonymity, it does hurt their connectivity and performance. Tor nodes are publicly known and are not the same as Tor users. One…

  5. comment
    Comment #6012570

    BitTorrent over I2P exists (and is popular). A torrent client is bundled out of the box. A custom spec exists for this also[1]. As for Tor.. Tor and BitTorrent do not mix; the band…

  6. comment
    Comment #6008087

    Relaying 'existing' traffic is the "random noise". It provides obscure, 'random' traffic between nodes but serves a purpose by providing bandwidth. The content of this traffic coul…

  7. comment
    Comment #6007653

    I2PBote[0]: distributed, p2p, encrypted, anonymous (internal) email. It uses I2P's DHT. [0] http://i2pbote.i2p.us/ (or http://i2pbote.i2p from inside I2P)

  8. comment
    Comment #6007590

    As I understand, modern cryptography is distinguishable from "random". Onion and garlic routing provide more useful and productive ways of reaching the same goal.

  9. comment
    Comment #6007560

    Any cryptographic application could be vulnerable and not "hold up". It is wrong and dangerous to suggest that any program or tool is absolute. A court case in Germany not long ago…

  10. comment
    Comment #6007536

    I2P has been around since 2003, same time period as Tor's beginnings. You can read academic review here which may help answer your question: http://www.i2p2.de/papers.html

  11. comment
    Comment #6007529

    This is already done in a variety of networks for plausible deniability. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorFAQ#DoI... I2P does similar in making every user an in…

  12. comment
    Comment #5846037

    "small systems"; I get that it can be hell-like on very small systems but the Raspberry Pi works great. There's a thread on zzz.i2p about it.

  13. comment
    Comment #5846035

    You can disable/lower routing. There is also bandwidth limiting. I don't recommend disabling the routing entirely, however.

  14. story
    YouTube spitting out obscure message for all searches

    "There may be confidential content in your search results. Please do not share outside Google." shows up on all youtube searches Sample: URL: https://www.youtube.com/results?search…

  15. comment
    Comment #5313424

    VPNs are constantly being mentioned as a solution to companies, governments, etc attacking privacy but it's extremely easy to make a bad choice and end up with more than you bargai…