Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cltby

cltby

HN member
Joined
Mon, Aug 10, 2020, 1:18 PM UTC
HN karma
60
Public activity
146 items

About cltby

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40636938

    I would think you should admire her for taking a strong moral stand at the expense of the business. She added a number of grievance-oriented features to reduce "bigotry", "xenophob…

  2. comment
    Comment #39456402

    Criminality is congenital. Social interventions will not fix the kid. Neither for that matter will prison, but at least it will protect the rest of us from his increasingly violent…

  3. comment
    Comment #39149000

    > (and unless you are a crook, there is not) What sort of shenanigans do you think profitable automated traders are engaged in?

  4. comment
    Comment #38309224

    High frequency trading (measuring latency, inferring event ordering, etc). Since most crypto derivatives trading takes place at ap-northeast-1, it feels like AWS is orienting this …

  5. comment
    Comment #37659360

    Because we should have strong priors disfavoring regulation, and this is a stalking horse for yet more internet regulation.

  6. comment
    Comment #37605943

    Sorry, is your criticism that IQ proponents conflate point estimates with unknown population parameters? Is that what other IQ critics see as the core of the disagreement in this d…

  7. comment
    Comment #37602696

    > otherwise identical cohorts. You could do this stratification/matching for any IQ study. What's special about lead-IQ?

  8. comment
    Comment #37602641

    But these controls could be done for any IQ-related study. Is IQ-skepticism based on the belief that IQ researchers generally don't use controls? That lead-IQ researchers alone do …

  9. comment
    Comment #37602192

    Question for any IQ skeptics here (e.g. "it just measures your ability to take tests" or "it just tells you how rich your parents are"): what's your response to studies like this? …

  10. comment
    Comment #37576655

    Good comment. I concede if it's really ~$20/month it's a rounding error and an obvious policy win.

  11. comment
    Comment #37576534

    There's wide, wide middle ground between celibacy and the debauched status quo.

  12. comment
    Comment #37576258

    Rather depressing that we're subsidizing wanton sexual indulgence to the tune of $30k/year/person.

  13. comment
    Comment #37263874

    Assuming: * average 1% asset management fee (modal number if you poke around) * 0% investment carry (hedge funds get away with charging this, but most asset managers don't) * 9% ef…

  14. comment
    Comment #37251902

    > The United States seeks fair consideration and back pay for asylees and refugees who were deterred or denied employment at SpaceX due to the alleged discrimination. Does anybody …

  15. comment
    Comment #37029514

    Because models are trained and validated on real data. Given a training set of crimes and corresponding surveillance footage, arrestee info is a (not noisy) label for “who is the g…

  16. comment
    Comment #37027923

    With a moment's thought, even the most emotive amongst us should see that the mugshots will be part of the training set--the photographed individuals are, after all, the class of t…

  17. comment
    Comment #37027857

    This doesn't rescue their claim. If the suggested class imbalance really exists in the training/test sets, the model will preferentially identify whites as criminals.

  18. comment
    Comment #37027721

    Are black faces overrepresented or underrepresented? According to AI researchers, we're faced with Schrodinger's Mugshot--there's simultaneously too many and too few!

  19. comment
    Comment #37027335

    > "We believe this results from factors that include the lack of Black faces in the algorithms' training data sets..." the researchers wrote in an op-ed for Scientific American. > …

  20. comment
    Comment #36914352

    If illegal aliens count for apportionment, why shouldn't prisoners?

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #32217445

    Agreed. Just want to preempt any arguments about incarceration “wasting their potential.”

  23. comment
    Comment #32217434

    Yes, I would happily reconsider in this case.

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #30042010

    The transparency push would effectively veto race and gender teachings--the bet being that any teacher pushing leftist doctrines would be buried under parent complaints. Needless t…