Viewing profile — cle
cle
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 12, 2012, 5:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,470
- Public activity
- 1,583 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48330978
The security model and runtime requirements are completely different between making an HTTP request and executing arbitrary code. They have different tradeoffs.
-
comment
Comment #47734028
What? I get so much joy out of learning the details of careers of people in different industries than me. I had an hourlong conversation with someone the other day who is in the hi…
-
comment
Comment #47089880
GP didn't say it's not a problem and not worth fixing. They're claiming this is not a good fix.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46646254
> The issue is that "83 per second" is multiple orders of magnitude off the expected level of performance on any RDBMS running on anything resembling modern hardware. This is just …
-
comment
Comment #46635806
Americans think "supporting universities" is not necessarily the same as "supporting science."
-
comment
Comment #46615861
This comes up every time this conversation occurs. Yes, PG can theoretically handle just about anything with the right configuration, schema, architecture, etc. Finding that right …
-
comment
Comment #45737588
There are good arguments for it, but it's also not a coincidence that they happen to align with Google's business objectives. Ex it's hard to issue a TLS cert without notifying Goo…
-
comment
Comment #45645032
That will not work with many of the world's most important documents because of information density. For example, dense tables or tables with lots of row/col spans, or complex form…
-
comment
Comment #45532067
> How many degrees of freedom do you real need to represent API cost. The amount that your users care about. At a large enough scale, users will care about the cost differences bet…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44855961
I write these as part of my job, I know how they work. I'm not going to spend more time explaining to you (and demonstrating!) what is in the spec. Read the spec and let the author…
-
comment
Comment #44851730
I'd encourage you to read the MCP specification: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/ser... Or write a simple MCP server and a client that uses it. FastMCP is …
-
comment
Comment #44851705
What you described is essentially how it works. The LLM has no control over how the inputs & outputs are validated, nor in how the result is fed back into it. The MCP interface (Cl…
-
comment
Comment #44851420
Every time the LLM uses this tool, the response schema is validated--deterministically. The LLM will never see a non-integer value as output from the tool.
-
comment
Comment #44850330
Generally you'd use a time library to model ISO-8601 dates in a typesafe way. Some fancier languages might have syntactic support for it, but they ultimately serve the same purpose…
-
comment
Comment #44850111
This is deterministic, it is validating the response using a JSON Schema validator and refusing to pass it to an LLM inference. I can't gaurantee that behavior will remain the same…
-
comment
Comment #44849695
I just tried this in Claude Code. I made an MCP server whose tool output is declared as an integer but it returns a string at runtime. Claude Code validated the response against th…
-
comment
Comment #44849325
I don't understand this criticism by the author. MCP supports JSON Schema, and server responses must conform to the schema. If the schema requires an ISO-8601 timestamp (ex by spec…
- comment
- comment