Viewing profile — cjawdb
cjawdb
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 31, 2023, 9:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 67
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cjawdb
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39283556
I mean, you realize that there are mathematical limits to how much you can compress information, right? And WebP/AVIF didn't achieve anywhere near 50% and were adopted by the Chrom…
-
comment
Comment #39278213
They did. It's called JXL. JXL is clearly technically superior to WebP and AVIF and the decisions from the Chromium team (not even Google as a whole, since they have a Google Resea…
-
comment
Comment #39278177
HEIC is barely used and seems very cherry-picked to find something that IS still royalty encumbered. >Pretty much all modern video/audio/image codecs are The exact opposite is true…
-
comment
Comment #39278125
I'm not sure why you didn't bother looking this up before commenting but JPEG XL is royalty-free and open source. There were some concerns raised well over a year ago about some sp…
-
comment
Comment #39278087
"A solution to a vanishing edge case" is a wild-ass statement to make about progressive decoding.
-
comment
Comment #39255830
The commit to add the flag saying JXL was being removed soon was reviewed and approved by James Zern, who also created and authored the commit that actually ripped out the JXL code…
-
comment
Comment #36214304
LOL well that makes much more sense. Hopefully JXL doesn't go the way of JPEG2000 (based on how things have gone thus far and its impressive featureset, I think it might be safe).
-
comment
Comment #36214283
I don't disagree but unfortunately that's the state of Mozilla at the moment.
-
comment
Comment #36213886
100% agree. I'd say JXL is going to be the closest thing we get to a universal image format for quite some time. Almost completely superior to JPEG/PNG/GIF/WebP/etc. and clearly su…
-
comment
Comment #36207393
Firefox has next to zero marketshare (unfortunately and despite my best efforts to get people to use FF). There was never any chance that Mozilla was going to waste their very limi…
-
comment
Comment #36207355
Phrasing this like "well Google must know best because they employ some subset of the people that worked on JXL" when the entire rest of the industry has been very overwhelmingly p…
-
comment
Comment #36207037
I'm confused where you got "it was available for years and ignored in popular software" from? Most of the ISO standard was only published last year, with the last bit being publish…
-
comment
Comment #36206922
More accurately, their justification was based on discredited benchmarks (which used a fairly old-even-at-the-time version of libjxl and IIRC created by the AVIF team)... and the c…
-
comment
Comment #36206838
This is the terrible explanation they gave for dropping support: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=117805... "Thank you everyone for your comments and feedback …