Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — civet_java

civet_java

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jun 19, 2026, 6:17 PM UTC
HN karma
401
Public activity
43 items

About civet_java

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48740494

    Thanks for the considered response. > I think this is a "vote with your wallet" sort of situation. I agree a 100%. > is the value proposition good enough that people will put up wi…

  2. comment
    Comment #48740430

    Aw buddy, you seem to think I'm trying to hurt you . Furthest, thing from the truth. I think you might have had enough HN for today. Take a nap and then eat a snack if you still fe…

  3. comment
    Comment #48740243

    That's true, I am less familiar with the workings of cloud services than some are (as relevant as that may be in a discussion about a client that users run on their local machines)…

  4. comment
    Comment #48738288

    If by a "finer-toothed comb" you mean telemetry then I don't quite see it as comparable to this situation. Telemetry is disclosed in privacy policies, it can usually be opted out o…

  5. comment
    Comment #48737661

    There are some commentors in this thread downplaying the severity of a service provider being less than transparent about exactly what their shipped tooling does on customer's mach…

  6. comment
    Comment #48737444

    Copying over my comment from elsewhere in this post: Anthopic choosing to delay their models' invevitable distillation by competitors is their prerogative. That they choose to impl…

  7. comment
    Comment #48737349

    Anthopic choosing to delay their models' invevitable distillation by competitors is their prerogative. That they choose to implement it by fingerprinting my access patterns without…

  8. comment
    Comment #48737079

    I'm not sure I understand your point. What benefits does treating social/national governence as an industry bring to society? Besides the govt funds it operations through taxation …

  9. comment
    Comment #48718180

    It doesn't generate private returns but investing in your worker population definitely nets returns for the public. Also, some might say that upending the de facto copyright regime…

  10. comment
    Comment #48694341

    Right back at ya buddy. Nothing quite like seeing a braggart humbled :)

  11. comment
    Comment #48693175

    Well, I for one hope you are horribly wrong. And something about this train of thought aligning with just the general quality of your comments gives me hope.

  12. comment
    Comment #48692463

    I see your comments scattered across this thread with most converging on this thesis: "The US govt will regulate away the ability of US corporations and individuals to use unsancti…

  13. comment
    Comment #48685678

    On the other I think asking someone for a citation to their rather strong claim isn't incorrect. Digging through unstructured HN comments isn't my idea of a good time and being sen…

  14. comment
    Comment #48680360

    Why is the grievance petty?

  15. comment
    Comment #48680340

    Well you seem to clearly be in the know. Care to share?

  16. comment
    Comment #48678311

    I'm not sure I fully understand this "society as a dinner crowd" metaphor you're painting here - who is the govt here and what are taxes and most importantly what is the food every…

  17. comment
    Comment #48677176

    I had exactly this happen to me, suffered great monetary losses and had my identity stolen. I've learnt my lesson and have moved on to 1password. At the end of it I couldn't help b…

  18. comment
    Comment #48677074

    I didn't realise that one could forcibly require a competitor to disclose trade secrets. Now, INAL of course, but I would think this sort of mechanism would be quite gameable from …

  19. comment
    Comment #48676867

    I am curious how this will play out legally. Surely UI enough isn't enough to prove that source code was plagiarised? In the event Papermark chooses to sue how will the defendant d…

  20. comment
    Comment #48676807

    > There’s no reason we couldn’t decide that we want to err on the side of employing too many people. One might bring up the personal consequences bourne by surplus employees who're…

  21. comment
    Comment #48676700

    I am quite sympathetic to your position. Seeing those who manage to evade accountability consistently paying a heavy personal price was immensely satisfying. But at the same time, …

  22. comment
    Comment #48676611

    Perhaps if the rank and file at a company see personal consequence for those in the topmost posistions (salary deductions, demotions, or firing) in response to such glaring fuck up…

  23. comment
    Comment #48674912

    In a world which already has the likes of Anthropic and OpenAI, having Chinese labs be a counter balance is decidedly better than the hypothetical where American companies had a gl…

  24. comment
    Comment #48673080

    I think the issue is that information was expensive until the owners of capital gatekept knowledge itself. Now that information is cheap to reproduce they'd rather gatekeep the con…

  25. comment
    Comment #48673024

    So what? You're a human (I'm assuming you are) and an LLM is not. The law ought to treat humans differently.