Viewing profile — civet_java
civet_java
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 19, 2026, 6:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 401
- Public activity
- 43 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About civet_java
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48740494
Thanks for the considered response. > I think this is a "vote with your wallet" sort of situation. I agree a 100%. > is the value proposition good enough that people will put up wi…
-
comment
Comment #48740430
Aw buddy, you seem to think I'm trying to hurt you . Furthest, thing from the truth. I think you might have had enough HN for today. Take a nap and then eat a snack if you still fe…
-
comment
Comment #48740243
That's true, I am less familiar with the workings of cloud services than some are (as relevant as that may be in a discussion about a client that users run on their local machines)…
-
comment
Comment #48738288
If by a "finer-toothed comb" you mean telemetry then I don't quite see it as comparable to this situation. Telemetry is disclosed in privacy policies, it can usually be opted out o…
-
comment
Comment #48737661
There are some commentors in this thread downplaying the severity of a service provider being less than transparent about exactly what their shipped tooling does on customer's mach…
-
comment
Comment #48737444
Copying over my comment from elsewhere in this post: Anthopic choosing to delay their models' invevitable distillation by competitors is their prerogative. That they choose to impl…
-
comment
Comment #48737349
Anthopic choosing to delay their models' invevitable distillation by competitors is their prerogative. That they choose to implement it by fingerprinting my access patterns without…
-
comment
Comment #48737079
I'm not sure I understand your point. What benefits does treating social/national governence as an industry bring to society? Besides the govt funds it operations through taxation …
-
comment
Comment #48718180
It doesn't generate private returns but investing in your worker population definitely nets returns for the public. Also, some might say that upending the de facto copyright regime…
-
comment
Comment #48694341
Right back at ya buddy. Nothing quite like seeing a braggart humbled :)
-
comment
Comment #48693175
Well, I for one hope you are horribly wrong. And something about this train of thought aligning with just the general quality of your comments gives me hope.
-
comment
Comment #48692463
I see your comments scattered across this thread with most converging on this thesis: "The US govt will regulate away the ability of US corporations and individuals to use unsancti…
-
comment
Comment #48685678
On the other I think asking someone for a citation to their rather strong claim isn't incorrect. Digging through unstructured HN comments isn't my idea of a good time and being sen…
-
comment
Comment #48680360
Why is the grievance petty?
-
comment
Comment #48680340
Well you seem to clearly be in the know. Care to share?
-
comment
Comment #48678311
I'm not sure I fully understand this "society as a dinner crowd" metaphor you're painting here - who is the govt here and what are taxes and most importantly what is the food every…
-
comment
Comment #48677176
I had exactly this happen to me, suffered great monetary losses and had my identity stolen. I've learnt my lesson and have moved on to 1password. At the end of it I couldn't help b…
-
comment
Comment #48677074
I didn't realise that one could forcibly require a competitor to disclose trade secrets. Now, INAL of course, but I would think this sort of mechanism would be quite gameable from …
-
comment
Comment #48676867
I am curious how this will play out legally. Surely UI enough isn't enough to prove that source code was plagiarised? In the event Papermark chooses to sue how will the defendant d…
-
comment
Comment #48676807
> There’s no reason we couldn’t decide that we want to err on the side of employing too many people. One might bring up the personal consequences bourne by surplus employees who're…
-
comment
Comment #48676700
I am quite sympathetic to your position. Seeing those who manage to evade accountability consistently paying a heavy personal price was immensely satisfying. But at the same time, …
-
comment
Comment #48676611
Perhaps if the rank and file at a company see personal consequence for those in the topmost posistions (salary deductions, demotions, or firing) in response to such glaring fuck up…
-
comment
Comment #48674912
In a world which already has the likes of Anthropic and OpenAI, having Chinese labs be a counter balance is decidedly better than the hypothetical where American companies had a gl…
-
comment
Comment #48673080
I think the issue is that information was expensive until the owners of capital gatekept knowledge itself. Now that information is cheap to reproduce they'd rather gatekeep the con…
-
comment
Comment #48673024
So what? You're a human (I'm assuming you are) and an LLM is not. The law ought to treat humans differently.