Viewing profile — chungusamongus
chungusamongus
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 16, 2026, 2:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 21
- Public activity
- 90 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chungusamongus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49258471
Sounds like an elaborate rationale to be lazy.
-
comment
Comment #49206634
Well, youre trading quality for accessibility. For some, that's acceptable. To me, the number of steam games that emulate that aesthetic is so massive that its become oversaturated…
-
comment
Comment #49199200
Nintendo is notoriously litigious.
-
comment
Comment #49197695
I consider all homebrew stuff very cool but the number of games emulating PS1 / N64 aesthetics is so massively oversaturated at this point that I'm kind of burned out on it. But in…
-
comment
Comment #49073672
But You've spent so much more time complaining and rationalizing your biases than it would take to simply read the story.
-
comment
Comment #49070568
Really? It just seems aggressively stupid.
-
comment
Comment #49070549
It is circular. The conclusion of your argument is included in the premises. Textbook begging the question, which is circular reasoning. "Slop" existed before AI. Just because LLMs…
-
comment
Comment #49065433
That's not what I said. Do you have trouble reading? Are you subliterate or just lazy?
-
comment
Comment #49063220
Please explain where I went wrong. Please explain why the onus is on the person presenting this story to account for all of the bad uses of AI, such that we should simply dismiss t…
-
comment
Comment #49062964
This took a few minutes for me to read. If that's what you consider high effort, that's a bigger problem. Ofc, reading comprehension is fairly poor these days but that was a trend …
-
comment
Comment #49062935
Yes, it is. Working on a sega genesis homebrew game. I focus on visuals, dialogue, narrative logic, music, etc., and GPT worries about the rest. It works for me. I couldn't care le…
-
comment
Comment #49062400
You have done nothing to demonstrate how that's even relevant here. The person who posted this is not "bad" simply because they have used an LLM.
-
comment
Comment #49061309
>The part that I personally find difficult is that I can’t easily gauge the amount of human effort put in. The amount of effort is not relevant. If I spend all day trying the jump …
-
comment
Comment #49061232
Then just state the conflict of interest instead of resorting to insults. The problem with your way of thinking is, sometimes your opponent is detestable, but that doesn't make the…
-
comment
Comment #49061031
That's circular reasoning
-
comment
Comment #49061010
And the signal I'm sending is, when I see people do that, I find it to be lazy and totally irrelevant to the content.
-
comment
Comment #49061001
Then why are you trying to debate me?
-
comment
Comment #49060995
It says it was written by deepseek v4. You are making it sound like they're being deceptive. Life is too short yet you waste it complaining about things like this. I dont think you…
-
comment
Comment #49060975
Fwiw I am much more impressed with the sophistication of someone's argument than i am their writing style. Kant has contributed much more than parfit depsite the abstract nature of…
-
comment
Comment #49060936
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49060916
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49060870
Kant is a better writer than the vast majority of writers. The problem is, the ideas he is trying to articulate are incredibly abstract. Hegel is like this too
-
comment
Comment #49060857
I didn't think it "sucked" to read. Anyway that's an aesthetic qualm, not a counterargument. Also the story has a disclaimer saying it was written by deepseek. I might have an issu…
-
comment
Comment #49060819
The model was trained on the code of the program that runs it, so it knows that program's bugs better than the humans who wrote the program. So it finds a tiny flaw and uses it to …
-
comment
Comment #49060708
The cost of reading this story is not high; you are just lazy and easily distracted. It took 5 minutes to read. You took more time to respond to this comment than it took to simply…