Viewing profile — christophberger
christophberger
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 9:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 30
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About christophberger
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43067145
The first rule of writing safety-critical systems in C: Don't write safety-critical systems in C.
-
comment
Comment #39012956
You don't need to measure your impact. It's enough to describe it. "Helped a large client improving their web presence for achieving increased conversion rates." Of course, you wer…
-
comment
Comment #38392858
A must-read (or rather: must-see) for anyone who thinks exponential backoff is overrated.
-
comment
Comment #37235782
The number of lines needed is not a good measure for gnarliness. (To be fair, I don't know if gnarliness is measurable at all.)
-
comment
Comment #15890486
I am afraid I cannot give you a direct answer, but here are two thoughts: 1. There seem to be a consent among Gophers to avoid frameworks where possible and use libraries instead. …
-
comment
Comment #15813781
I wonder how the current Go 1.9.x compares to v1.7.3 that was used in the article (which BTW will become one year old tomorrow - happy Birthday!)
-
comment
Comment #15761253
Author here. I am excited to announce my Go course for devs who have little or no knowledge of Go and want to learn the complete language from scratch. Happy to answer any question…
- story
-
comment
Comment #15600299
This may be an interesting article; however, I stopped reading when I discovered that it is about math/rand and not crypt/rand. Any PRNG that is not cryptographically secure must b…
-
comment
Comment #15530740
> is that a valid hypothesis ? No, unless you have some solid studies at hand that would clearly support your „hypothesis“, it is nothing more than a highly biased imputation. Here…
-
comment
Comment #14429098
The readme might deserve some love. A one-liner is not that helpful... :)
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14154399
Generics have their use cases, but in general they are overrated. Especially in (but not limited to) the DevOps area, I bet that 99% of the code needs no generics at all. Having sa…
-
comment
Comment #14137307
> which makes it possible to change the path of project without worrying about GOPATH Trying to ignore GOPATH, or trying to work around the requirements of GOPATH, often calls for …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #14031431
Go is a pragmatic language, designed for programmer productivity. I think Go was never meant to be used as a language for reasoning about models and concepts at various abstraction…
-
comment
Comment #14029689
Argh! Forgot to include the "golang" keyword :)
- story
-
comment
Comment #13859723
Swift and Go aren't competitors. Different realms, different audiences.
-
comment
Comment #13808551
This Reddit thread reveals why the algorithm works: https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/5xrjh0/got_lucky_im...
-
comment
Comment #13512838
You are absolutely right to ask about possible downsides of a language before deciding to make the switch. However, there is a problem with your question: Define "not great". Every…
-
comment
Comment #13489288
IMHO the term "idiomatic" is overused. Every programming language has its idioms, and I am sure you'll learn them when working through Go tutorials, books, or courses. Important he…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13349136
If you want to contribute to the Go project itself, this article is a good start: https://blog.gopheracademy.com/advent-2016/contributing-to-t... For all other Go projects, check t…