Viewing profile — christina_b
christina_b
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 09, 2012, 6:18 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 590
- Public activity
- 46 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About christina_b
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19170843
Regular LTO for large sized projects (think Chromium sized), in my experience is by far the biggest bottleneck in the build process. It's partially the reason so much is being inve…
-
comment
Comment #14922165
I was pretty sure TouchMe was BetaMonkey's new nick, I don't think it was Ntoskrnl (MalwareTech). From what I've heard TouchMe continued support of his drone's users until he dissa…
-
comment
Comment #14921990
BetaMonkey/TouchMe was in fact the person I was referring to who was providing support for his botnet drone builder until he dissapeared with no trace at a later date. Just could n…
-
comment
Comment #14921438
I may be totally off base here but IIRC, before he ran MalwareTech and was a whitehat, he participated (and was an op) in fairly "shady" IRC channels, with his oldest nick I can re…
-
comment
Comment #13399152
Hm, I may have been wrong, would be nice to have someone who owns one of these boards to verify that: 1). The first stage bootloader doesn't require signing. 2). The first stage bo…
-
comment
Comment #13398738
All modern ARM chips support secure mode, it's a set of modes, in AArch64, we colloquially call them EL3 (Exception level 3, highest privilege level above EL2, the hypervisor level…
-
comment
Comment #13398000
See my other comment about Allwinner, but basically my biggest issue is that they lock down their bootloader with signing and do not allow you to execute code in EL3/Secure mode wi…
-
comment
Comment #13397994
If a "development" board does not let me run my own code in EL3 (Secure monitor mode), I'm not buying it, as simple as that. A lot of boards that use Allwinner chips will use a sig…
-
comment
Comment #13397779
>All of these could probably have been fixed with minimal support from broadcom (and a bit more open thinking from them during the design). Support from Broadcom is unlikely to fix…
-
comment
Comment #13397412
>drivers handling graphics Actually that's open and mainlined now, there are DRM drivers for BCM285x family but they rely on mailbox interfaces for power and clock management.
-
comment
Comment #13397354
Currently it sleeps and waits for a mailbox interrupt after which it acks it and goes back to sleep. We're planning on using the interface to load a second stage firmware that woul…
-
comment
Comment #13397293
>No, Broadcom is quite unique in requiring blobs to boot. Yes precisely, so we offer an alternative to those blobs that allows you to boot ARM without needing a closed-source firmw…
-
comment
Comment #13397286
We have considered it, however, because there's still a need for a firmware, the first stage bootloader and the firmware itself are using a common driver framework, it just makes t…
-
comment
Comment #13397264
binutils/GCC, have Julian to thank for his wonderful toolchain: https://github.com/puppeh/vc4-toolchain
-
comment
Comment #13396949
>unlocking the unique video core to get anywhere near there We actually have documented most vector instructions of VC4 and Julian's toolchain supports pretty much all documented o…
- story
-
comment
Comment #12751534
Oh, which aspects?
-
comment
Comment #11705550
Actually, the bulk SDRAM/ARM work was done by me in the space of around month (though I only ARM to finally work three days ago with Herman's help). You could run Linux on ARM usin…
-
comment
Comment #11704229
Yes if you can implement high performance video codecs using pretty much undocumented vector instructions of the VPU, you are welcome to do so.
-
comment
Comment #11704174
It wasn't a leak, Broadcom publicly released all this code a while ago to aid the making of an open source GPU driver. All this has been licensed under 3-Clause BSD license and dis…
-
comment
Comment #11618708
Yeah, I saw, I haven't looked at it in detail but I think yours probably works better than mine since you did comprehensive testing. My only tests involved compiling my own firmwar…
-
comment
Comment #11618415
I outlined what I did in another comment, here's a log from my current firmware: http://crna.cc/vpu_bootlog.txt I think I'm on the right track but I don't have ARM working yet, mos…
-
comment
Comment #11618343
VC4 itself doesn't have a MMU per se, it supports very limited memory remap (like PPC BATs) so running a conventional kernel on it is probably not possible. Best bet would be to po…
-
comment
Comment #11618252
Don't think I can without first implementing MC emission and running LLVM unit tests on it.
-
comment
Comment #11618187
Yeah I looked at it, my firmware mostly just aims at bringing up enough stuff to be able to boot ARM, which is essentially just: - Setting up exception vectors and enabling excepti…