Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — christina_b

christina_b

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jun 09, 2012, 6:18 AM UTC
HN karma
590
Public activity
46 items

About christina_b

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #19170843

    Regular LTO for large sized projects (think Chromium sized), in my experience is by far the biggest bottleneck in the build process. It's partially the reason so much is being inve…

  2. comment
    Comment #14922165

    I was pretty sure TouchMe was BetaMonkey's new nick, I don't think it was Ntoskrnl (MalwareTech). From what I've heard TouchMe continued support of his drone's users until he dissa…

  3. comment
    Comment #14921990

    BetaMonkey/TouchMe was in fact the person I was referring to who was providing support for his botnet drone builder until he dissapeared with no trace at a later date. Just could n…

  4. comment
    Comment #14921438

    I may be totally off base here but IIRC, before he ran MalwareTech and was a whitehat, he participated (and was an op) in fairly "shady" IRC channels, with his oldest nick I can re…

  5. comment
    Comment #13399152

    Hm, I may have been wrong, would be nice to have someone who owns one of these boards to verify that: 1). The first stage bootloader doesn't require signing. 2). The first stage bo…

  6. comment
    Comment #13398738

    All modern ARM chips support secure mode, it's a set of modes, in AArch64, we colloquially call them EL3 (Exception level 3, highest privilege level above EL2, the hypervisor level…

  7. comment
    Comment #13398000

    See my other comment about Allwinner, but basically my biggest issue is that they lock down their bootloader with signing and do not allow you to execute code in EL3/Secure mode wi…

  8. comment
    Comment #13397994

    If a "development" board does not let me run my own code in EL3 (Secure monitor mode), I'm not buying it, as simple as that. A lot of boards that use Allwinner chips will use a sig…

  9. comment
    Comment #13397779

    >All of these could probably have been fixed with minimal support from broadcom (and a bit more open thinking from them during the design). Support from Broadcom is unlikely to fix…

  10. comment
    Comment #13397412

    >drivers handling graphics Actually that's open and mainlined now, there are DRM drivers for BCM285x family but they rely on mailbox interfaces for power and clock management.

  11. comment
    Comment #13397354

    Currently it sleeps and waits for a mailbox interrupt after which it acks it and goes back to sleep. We're planning on using the interface to load a second stage firmware that woul…

  12. comment
    Comment #13397293

    >No, Broadcom is quite unique in requiring blobs to boot. Yes precisely, so we offer an alternative to those blobs that allows you to boot ARM without needing a closed-source firmw…

  13. comment
    Comment #13397286

    We have considered it, however, because there's still a need for a firmware, the first stage bootloader and the firmware itself are using a common driver framework, it just makes t…

  14. comment
    Comment #13397264

    binutils/GCC, have Julian to thank for his wonderful toolchain: https://github.com/puppeh/vc4-toolchain

  15. comment
    Comment #13396949

    >unlocking the unique video core to get anywhere near there We actually have documented most vector instructions of VC4 and Julian's toolchain supports pretty much all documented o…

  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #12751534

    Oh, which aspects?

  18. comment
    Comment #11705550

    Actually, the bulk SDRAM/ARM work was done by me in the space of around month (though I only ARM to finally work three days ago with Herman's help). You could run Linux on ARM usin…

  19. comment
    Comment #11704229

    Yes if you can implement high performance video codecs using pretty much undocumented vector instructions of the VPU, you are welcome to do so.

  20. comment
    Comment #11704174

    It wasn't a leak, Broadcom publicly released all this code a while ago to aid the making of an open source GPU driver. All this has been licensed under 3-Clause BSD license and dis…

  21. comment
    Comment #11618708

    Yeah, I saw, I haven't looked at it in detail but I think yours probably works better than mine since you did comprehensive testing. My only tests involved compiling my own firmwar…

  22. comment
    Comment #11618415

    I outlined what I did in another comment, here's a log from my current firmware: http://crna.cc/vpu_bootlog.txt I think I'm on the right track but I don't have ARM working yet, mos…

  23. comment
    Comment #11618343

    VC4 itself doesn't have a MMU per se, it supports very limited memory remap (like PPC BATs) so running a conventional kernel on it is probably not possible. Best bet would be to po…

  24. comment
    Comment #11618252

    Don't think I can without first implementing MC emission and running LLVM unit tests on it.

  25. comment
    Comment #11618187

    Yeah I looked at it, my firmware mostly just aims at bringing up enough stuff to be able to boot ARM, which is essentially just: - Setting up exception vectors and enabling excepti…