Viewing profile — chrishas35
chrishas35
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 04, 2012, 2:43 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 205
- Public activity
- 50 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chrishas35
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35821146
If you go to the user's profile and then to the post, it seems to be okay. So perhaps also looking at Referrer.
-
comment
Comment #34843767
Posted today...dated 2 days ago.
-
comment
Comment #33924723
When those 1s and 0s are deleted and that delete is replicated (or other catastrophic change, such as ransomware) you presumably don't have the ability to restore if all you're doi…
-
comment
Comment #31647503
> Apple’s implementation uses SMS as a backup. I hope they'll go away from this, or at least give the option. I won't use their password/key storage until they do. 2FA is only as g…
-
comment
Comment #31230887
Where would you like to see it be more relaxed? While the documentation has some pretty strong recommendations, other than the top 5 accounts, you can pretty much do as you wish.
-
comment
Comment #30661542
Not when it's an event in the past. When the event in the past you know which TZ rules to apply for conversion. The issues arise for the future because you don't know what change m…
-
comment
Comment #30001024
I think the issue is that so many of us were brought in on something pretty simple, "GMail for Domains", that has become so much more than we ever asked for. And in return we've go…
-
comment
Comment #27170600
> I wonder if they considered having a couple of big lights in center field for the ump to get this info visually. I think having the automated call kept semi-private is part of th…
-
comment
Comment #27118486
But that's exactly what the article did without actually mentioning Challenger. A very strange article. "It trails only these four shuttle orbiters (we're not going to mention the …
-
comment
Comment #27015568
Yes, that is the plan now. It was not the original because…we’ve never flown on another planet before. It was successful so they are changing the parameters after learning more. SC…
-
comment
Comment #27012023
Helicopter requires rover to be near by as means of communications as helicopter itself can not directly communicate. Thus, it originally had a limited time as the rover needs to m…
-
comment
Comment #27012013
They have stated they have no intentions of using the rover to do so. I would think given this is now “extra credit” doing so becomes even less likely.
-
comment
Comment #26763118
Author probably could have chosen a better example such that it doesn't look like the author chose letters sequently. In this case the letters are meaningful as they are the same a…
-
comment
Comment #26461565
Split the difference and let’s move on.
-
comment
Comment #26461555
And there is a compromise to be had here... a one-time 30 minute change, and we’re done. There is strong consensus to eliminate the time change, but which time to choose as permane…
-
comment
Comment #25648396
Not at all. The crazy/absurd part is compromise of opposing view points in Congress ;)
-
comment
Comment #25647905
Crazy idea here, but how about a....compromise! A one time 30 minute offset and we'll really screw everyone up, but it's equal to both sides.
-
comment
Comment #25349772
The bit about Nate taking the flack for it being delayed was pretty good IMO. No insider acknowledge, but regardless of why it may have taken so long it's nice to see the buck stop…
-
comment
Comment #24126332
It's commonly called a reverse split.
-
comment
Comment #23396595
December is concerning...
-
comment
Comment #22228127
There were no end-user visible certificate errors during the outage, so I suspect it was an internal/backend cert.
-
comment
Comment #20180066
One of the phrases I picked up watching younger family members be raised that I've tried to apply, when appropriate, as a parent: "They'll only do it once." Learning the why behind…
-
comment
Comment #16641781
I feel like they really doubled down on that by naming Kogan.... "see, it was just one bad developer"
-
comment
Comment #16579474
> Also, couldn't fraudsters circumvent this entirely by paying in cash? Are they doing it off credit cards, or scanning your ID when you present the return and running that?
-
comment
Comment #16579455
I did a return on Amazon last week where not only was there no shipping charge, but I didn't have any additional expense...box, label, time, gas, etc. They scheduled UPS for the pi…