Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — chottocharaii

chottocharaii

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jun 06, 2018, 2:08 PM UTC
HN karma
562
Public activity
135 items

About chottocharaii

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #42198915

    I don't understand this perspective. Why should I resent the creation of value from behaviours that I would be doing anyway.

  3. comment
    Comment #40206385

    This isn't going to work so long as WikiData is controlled by admins that misapply the notability criteria to delete information they subjectively consider trivial I think the next…

  4. comment
    Comment #40166040

    Two problems: - Incentivising decentralised infrastructure (this solves that) - Incentivising content creation (completely different issue, will always require a political solution…

  5. comment
    Comment #40152414

    These kinds of comments are legally ignorant. I’m always taken aback by these kinds of “but actually” comments on HN that ‘correct’ another user without any regard to how the law w…

  6. comment
    Comment #39850634

    I think it’s a reasonable explanation to a reasonable moral decision. Good for Harvard

  7. comment
    Comment #39791307

    "My map represents the first attempt to map Australian laws, cases and regulations across the Commonwealth, States and Territories semantically, that is, by their underlying meanin…

  8. comment
    Comment #39439008

    This is such a boring, semantic argument NVIDIA’s products can colloquially be described as commodities in some contexts, as GPUs from NVIDIA can be interchangeable with GPUs from …

  9. comment
    Comment #39416669

    Okay so if that’s the case the developers/owners will work out the most economic model; whether it’s best to satisfy demand with bays or without bays This is self-correcting. Minim…

  10. comment
    Comment #39214108

    Well said !!

  11. comment
    Comment #39040497

    The analogy is apt

  12. comment
    Comment #38948151

    think there’s a misunderstanding. in my jurisdiction we use the word offence to refer to criminal actions. If the penalty is only civil, then this bolsters the case for being bold …

  13. comment
    Comment #38935058

    We need orphan work legislation to clarify the law in this area

  14. comment
    Comment #38935054

    Riskier legal plays have been made

  15. comment
    Comment #38935047

    In ‘orphan work’ situations as long as a person had made a good faith effort to locate the copyright owner, and therefore isn’t infringing someone’s copyright wilfully; criminal li…

  16. comment
    Comment #38907409

    I’d expect that if the maker undertook a thorough and well-documented search for the rights holder; then just made it anyway, they’d legally be covered 1) It might be hard for the …

  17. comment
    Comment #38123551

    OTOH slavery is so morally abhorrent that it far outweighs any positive contributions a person might make in their lifetime. I think its good that society condemns it in the strong…

  18. comment
    Comment #37639171

    Or, just let people and computers be inspired Ideas have never been the scope of copyright and it wasn’t in its democratic mandate. If creatives want that change, fine, advocate fo…

  19. comment
    Comment #37379140

    why take it literally

  20. comment
    Comment #37345669

    What you’re describing requires an ability to copyright style on top of expression. That would be an unacceptable constraint on freedom of speech and artistic freedom in my view Th…

  21. comment
    Comment #36996021

    Why not just leave your account inactive?

  22. comment
    Comment #36995992

    Oh you. You nailed it. That's the core difference. /s

  23. comment
    Comment #36842218

    Its more efficient for them to satisfice through obtaining graduates with good signalling factors (good schools) than sort the wheat from the chaff themselves Ensuring opportunitie…

  24. comment
    Comment #36749066

    This just in: businesses employ people

  25. comment
    Comment #36609375

    Yes it'd be a derivative work owned by Paolini. Paolini would have copyright to the derivative work, to the extent that he has rights over derivative material. However, the prompte…