Viewing profile — chombier
chombier
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 30, 2014, 5:25 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 293
- Public activity
- 207 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chombier
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48627579
IIRC there's a fairly natural positive definite quadratic form on GA (used as the canonical norm) that takes the scalar part of the geometric product of a multi-vector and its reve…
-
comment
Comment #48620399
> pull out Hodge Duals every time you want to do something that involves the metric, but I'm also unconvinced that geometric algebra is the answer here. I don't know, I recently tr…
-
comment
Comment #48620229
If you ever wondered how to write a programming language, this is probably the best resource to get started (and then of course Crafting Interpreters). See also part 2 https://norv…
-
comment
Comment #48543207
Gimbal lock?
-
comment
Comment #48035937
I was a bit curious to learn what the differences are between this and the actor model, and I found this lobste.rs discussion to be helpful: https://lobste.rs/s/gsjskz/behavior_ori…
-
comment
Comment #46300812
Apart from installation problems/crash issues, do you have some feedback about type checking with ty vs. pyrefly? Which is stricter, soundness issues, etc? Both are rust/open-sourc…
-
comment
Comment #46219881
For inextensible cloth there's also "Efficient simulation of inextensible cloth" [0] that is particularly clever and efficient [0] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1276377.1276438
-
comment
Comment #46145125
Also check out Jean Gallier's notes (available online) https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~jean/gbooks/manif.html
-
comment
Comment #45977607
Nice! It would be interesting to visualize the total momentum vector, IIRC Verlet being symplectic should be good at preserving symmetries, whereas RK4 is good at conserving energy…
-
comment
Comment #45274076
I've been programming in c++ for 25 years (15 professionally) and I really don't see any reason to keep using it apart from dealing with legacy codebases. Most arguments in the art…
-
comment
Comment #45254001
Thanks, I scanned through all the comments/links but this is the actual resource one wants to read to get familiar with Backpack.
-
comment
Comment #45037292
my tl;dr: after reading the article: - two 64-bits words representation - fixed, 32 bits length - short strings ( - long strings store a 4 byte prefix in-place + pointer to the res…
-
comment
Comment #44970182
That was a nice read, thanks.
-
comment
Comment #44529599
A quick comparison of the two languages would be interesting, in case anyone has experience with both.
-
comment
Comment #44518833
The PLDI talk is also available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJi_Fcs4bak
-
comment
Comment #43822628
pandoc has a reveal.js backend which I use it to build my slides from markdown (with a few ad-hoc inline css tweaks)
-
comment
Comment #43641982
What I found hard with Nix is the sheer amount of things I had to get familiar with before it started to really click: - nix, the command-line tool - nix, the language - nixpkgs wi…
-
comment
Comment #43277898
Yes, but from the canonical form of rotation matrices [1] I would expect such matrices to be represented as a sum of bi-vectors/rotors, which should take the same amount of data? […
-
comment
Comment #43268614
Geometric Algebra supporters keep advertising that rotors are great since they work in any dimension, which makes me wonder: would an arbitrary n-dimensional SVD-like decomposition…
-
comment
Comment #42916822
> and also faster than it takes me to verify the answer given by the machine. I always thought there was a kind of NP-flavor to the problems for which LLMs-like AI are helpful in p…
-
comment
Comment #42303863
Not exactly the same: `x` is given a polymorphic type (in F) in Haskell (restricted to values in ML) whereas the unannotated let-over-lambda will give `x`a monomorphic type.
-
comment
Comment #42233971
There is a kind of "do notation" in OCaml with binding operators [1] (let*) for monads and (let+) for applicatives that is actually quite pleasant in practice. [1] https://ocaml.or…
-
comment
Comment #42162609
Besides, if you still want to skip learning there are escape hatches like Rc but these hint pretty strongly (e.g. clones everywhere) that something might be wrong somewhere.
-
comment
Comment #42162590
> Of course you have to internalise the rules of a borrow checker This is generally a good thing: the more you internalise the logic of borrow checking, the earlier you start think…
-
comment
Comment #40807493
I think this is because `mutable` qualifies the call operator of the lambda (like a reverse const qualifier) so by-value captures are effectively const during the call unless the l…