Viewing profile — chickopozo
chickopozo
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 24, 2013, 11:56 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 22
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chickopozo
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #5516588
People use a GUI for git?
-
comment
Comment #5516582
/facepalm Whilst the article is written like a movie plot you on the other hand are looking for things that are not there mate.
-
comment
Comment #5515195
http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?k=01eHy-6e8CKpz-d... k is your id and c is the ciphertext the key is stored on their server.
-
comment
Comment #5515185
This has existed for years: http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/ And your email isn't stored but rather encrypted and the ciphertext passed via the url.
-
comment
Comment #5511428
I think the software was called canoscan.
-
comment
Comment #5511425
I bought a Canon scanner in 1996. It had a one click email button on it. I hooked my computer to the net so... does this mean I should really hold the patent?
-
comment
Comment #5509387
How is this news? Its been done so many times I've lost count.
-
comment
Comment #5502552
They used a hacky method from the old IE Toolbar. That's like me scraping a website and blaming them when they change it.
-
comment
Comment #5502542
TL;DR Author is wrong about clickjacking and sandboxing is a good thing.
-
comment
Comment #5502540
I commented on the page why the author should not give security advice. You should use a different domain as there are tricks to leverage arbitrary js on a subdomain. Sandboxing is…
-
comment
Comment #5441808
Great another unproven tool tech "journalists" will be dangerously touting as secure. See: cryptocat.
-
comment
Comment #5441797
He's saying it should not be considered secure until proven.
-
comment
Comment #5440413
Dear Digg, If you use the work social whilst creating a RSS reader you have already failed. Sincerely, People who actually used Google Reader P.S. A point-and-click html scraper to…
-
comment
Comment #5436225
But if you read up I have explained, fast is better in hash functions.
-
comment
Comment #5436223
Encryption does not provide Integrity (hash) or authentication (mac) crypt(1) should be an example of how not to do hashing.
-
comment
Comment #5436206
>Outside of this, no one should be using MD5 in this day and age, I would even recommend against Sha256 and other variants in that family, though I have a lot of respect for Blowfi…
-
comment
Comment #5436170
Blog: https://www.cloudcracker.com/blog/
-
comment
Comment #5436166
I want my time back, three pages on basically nothing. I broke into my house last year because I lost my keys -> brb writing an article titled "How I became a burglar and locksmith…
-
comment
Comment #5431813
The same hardware, in the same location, running the same software, same power source, next to each other. It's quite likely actually. Do you do your backups to an identical* compu…