Viewing profile — chewchew
chewchew
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 17, 2016, 5:58 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 18
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chewchew
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16770588
Right now I wouldn't say prime now's inventory integration is any better, but I'm sure it eventually will be. Both instacart and prime now seem to have trouble determining if an it…
-
comment
Comment #16164606
Graphcool is awesome. I think you guys made the right choice moving to a code-first, open-source platform. Obviously you still need to make money. Besides hosting and automatic bac…
-
comment
Comment #14003563
Have you ever actually used it? It does greatly improve developer ergonomics on the client side. Check out Apollo + React (or another framework).
-
comment
Comment #12729732
In this case, a single mysql instance with individual databases may indeed be the best approach. It'd be very easy to launch a mysql container and have each wordpress container tal…
-
comment
Comment #12728111
Yes that's a pretty good approach. Just organize the configs in a directory structure on your host and mount them as volumes (along with any other necessary volumes for e.g. upload…
-
comment
Comment #12727895
It's not one or the other. Restarting might save you some downtime if you're running a single IRC container. That doesn't mean you shouldn't find and resolve the root issue. Normal…
-
comment
Comment #12727643
The absolute easiest is probably Docker Cloud. I've checked it out but haven't really used it much. It's still relatively immature but if you just want to deploy and forget somethi…
-
comment
Comment #12727616
As someone said, this is the normal behavior in the Erlang/Elixir world, and it seems to have worked extremely well for the telecom industry. That said, my reply was to someone run…
-
comment
Comment #12723628
Distributed storage is still a big issue for sure. There are some options, but none are ideal. One option is to map to host and use NFS to share across hosts. Another option is to …
-
comment
Comment #12723499
> wait. aren't these things supposed to give us less pieces to arrange and manage? No, not fewer pieces. You'll have more pieces, but you can combine the pieces and control them in…
-
comment
Comment #12723434
You're right, it's not quite that easy yet, but it probably will be eventually. Docker just provides the building blocks. SaaS providers like Docker Cloud will get better and conti…
-
comment
Comment #12723367
I don't think that's the whole point. If all you care about is packaging your code in a container, then you don't need Docker. That was solved long ago. Docker simply adds a nice A…
-
comment
Comment #12723170
Docker gives you the building blocks, but that means you have more pieces to arrange and manage. Take a look at Docker Compose if you haven't already, since the Docker CLI only get…
-
comment
Comment #12722981
It's up to you to make your containers bloated or keep them slim. You can use the alpine versions of the official Dockerhub images. Python on Alpine is 30 MB (vs 267 MB for the deb…