Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — chewchew

chewchew

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 17, 2016, 5:58 AM UTC
HN karma
18
Public activity
14 items

About chewchew

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #16770588

    Right now I wouldn't say prime now's inventory integration is any better, but I'm sure it eventually will be. Both instacart and prime now seem to have trouble determining if an it…

  2. comment
    Comment #16164606

    Graphcool is awesome. I think you guys made the right choice moving to a code-first, open-source platform. Obviously you still need to make money. Besides hosting and automatic bac…

  3. comment
    Comment #14003563

    Have you ever actually used it? It does greatly improve developer ergonomics on the client side. Check out Apollo + React (or another framework).

  4. comment
    Comment #12729732

    In this case, a single mysql instance with individual databases may indeed be the best approach. It'd be very easy to launch a mysql container and have each wordpress container tal…

  5. comment
    Comment #12728111

    Yes that's a pretty good approach. Just organize the configs in a directory structure on your host and mount them as volumes (along with any other necessary volumes for e.g. upload…

  6. comment
    Comment #12727895

    It's not one or the other. Restarting might save you some downtime if you're running a single IRC container. That doesn't mean you shouldn't find and resolve the root issue. Normal…

  7. comment
    Comment #12727643

    The absolute easiest is probably Docker Cloud. I've checked it out but haven't really used it much. It's still relatively immature but if you just want to deploy and forget somethi…

  8. comment
    Comment #12727616

    As someone said, this is the normal behavior in the Erlang/Elixir world, and it seems to have worked extremely well for the telecom industry. That said, my reply was to someone run…

  9. comment
    Comment #12723628

    Distributed storage is still a big issue for sure. There are some options, but none are ideal. One option is to map to host and use NFS to share across hosts. Another option is to …

  10. comment
    Comment #12723499

    > wait. aren't these things supposed to give us less pieces to arrange and manage? No, not fewer pieces. You'll have more pieces, but you can combine the pieces and control them in…

  11. comment
    Comment #12723434

    You're right, it's not quite that easy yet, but it probably will be eventually. Docker just provides the building blocks. SaaS providers like Docker Cloud will get better and conti…

  12. comment
    Comment #12723367

    I don't think that's the whole point. If all you care about is packaging your code in a container, then you don't need Docker. That was solved long ago. Docker simply adds a nice A…

  13. comment
    Comment #12723170

    Docker gives you the building blocks, but that means you have more pieces to arrange and manage. Take a look at Docker Compose if you haven't already, since the Docker CLI only get…

  14. comment
    Comment #12722981

    It's up to you to make your containers bloated or keep them slim. You can use the alpine versions of the official Dockerhub images. Python on Alpine is 30 MB (vs 267 MB for the deb…