Viewing profile — cheevly
cheevly
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 12, 2021, 11:24 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 10
- Public activity
- 166 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cheevly
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49139701
Altman has no shares in OpenAI.
-
comment
Comment #49062236
Every word of this seems objectively false. AI is more than capable of handling the details. I have generated countless tools for myself without needing to know or care about the d…
-
comment
Comment #48861220
Maybe like… focus on the actual content instead of perceived writing patterns? Crazy I know.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48786419
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48786274
There are at least a dozen scaling laws for AI right now. It’s improving on so many different fronts that people don’t seem to comprehend.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48772604
The irony of this article is thick.
-
comment
Comment #48654366
I'm pretty sure programmers weren't the ones writing the specs in the past...
-
comment
Comment #48654261
Lacking willpower sounds biological to me... do you disagree??
-
comment
Comment #48417818
If yours cant, then I implore you to find better AI mediation tools.
-
comment
Comment #48417804
GPT literally generates perfect code for me in languages that do not exist anywhere in its training set, so I’m not sure how you’ve achieved this level of failure.
-
comment
Comment #48417785
Ever since the first Davinci model of GPT-3 ive literally been using LLMs daily. It was an indispensable tool for me from the very beginning and despite 10,000+ hours of usage and …
-
comment
Comment #48417705
When I use AI to produce a work, it’s human-made, just the same as when I use a computer to synthesize digital works using human-developed automation tools like word processors. Al…
-
comment
Comment #48417668
This is a great answer.
-
comment
Comment #48417656
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48417638
Yeaahh, that you assert that makes your point says a lot.
-
comment
Comment #48318701
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48303900
I think the prevailing answer is lack of evidence, with things like suffering / death and stuff as a close second.
-
comment
Comment #48281410
Imagine classifying Apple as AI experts. You are lost my dude.
-
comment
Comment #48280472
It really sounds like you’re doing it wrong (using multi-agent patterns of yesteryear). The proper way is to use multiple agents for work involving very large context, and splittin…
-
comment
Comment #48263902
Agents are perfectly capable of learning. Why would the model need to learn? The harness and tooling are all that matter.
-
comment
Comment #48263862
This is my experience. Though ice been writing LLM harnesses, agents, tooling, etc for 5 years now and believe it requires several hundred hours of experience before understanding …
-
comment
Comment #48263460
These types of comments help demonstrate first-hand how human reasoning stacks up against what an LLM would say in this situation.
-
comment
Comment #48263415
A lot of us have been doing this for over a year now.