Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — charukiewicz

charukiewicz

HN member
Joined
Thu, Mar 26, 2015, 2:31 AM UTC
HN karma
411
Public activity
34 items

About charukiewicz

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/charukiewicz; my proof: https://keybase.io/charukiewicz/sigs/O-CmKnl-WO32_n7W4rCOEJ5QhR2R1358UXknNySnjMI ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48659655

    Completely blocking the image information page to mobile user agents is completely unnecessary. I'd much rather look at your non optimized page than be told to come back on desktop…

  2. story
  3. story
  4. story
  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #37164029

    > It's a bit disingenuous to claim that I wrote the code once and it is now static Unless the library code were in some way self-updating or had some server side component, I think…

  7. comment
    Comment #37163746

    I've been working on a web application that has a bar code code scanning component and I will say that while the apparent performance of this library is impressive, I am not a fan …

  8. comment
    Comment #37162175

    > If you want a much clearer separation between frontend and backend of a site, especially in terms of contributors/teams, then it might not be the right tool. The point to take aw…

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #36408528

    Correct. Elm's publicity issues stem from how closed off the leadership is. There's Evan (creator) and a handful of trusted others that have a huge amount of sway over how the lang…

  11. comment
    Comment #36408316

    > Librem 5 fails #5 Where's the Librem 5 antenna? Can you link to reports of reception issues stemming from this?

  12. comment
    Comment #36050211

    The default settings append a number at the end, so that's 2.7e+14. Moreover, there's a separator character that may or may not be there, and may or may not be changed from the def…

  13. story
  14. story
  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #26528834

    > If you're a software engineer, it won't make a difference, just send two queries to the DB and combine the results before sending them off. This isn't true if you have certain us…

  17. comment
    Comment #26527746

    Author here. Between this and your other response, where you expound on the same point, I think you're being far too hand wavy about what causes performance issues. The number of j…

  18. comment
    Comment #26527134

    In the past we worked on a system that used MySQL 8. We used UNION (not UNION ALL, but I assume it doesn't matter) in several places, applying it to improve performance as we descr…

  19. comment
    Comment #26526769

    Author of the original article here. Temporary tables are different than using WITH (which are common table expressions, or CTEs). In many database engines, can make a temporary ta…

  20. comment
    Comment #26526738

    Author here. This doesn't give the correct results. It produces meal_items that have both customer_id and employee_id. Here's an excerpt (the full result set is thousands of rows, …

  21. comment
    Comment #26526611

    Author here, you are indeed correct that Query #2's final join can be an INNER join. However, I just tested it against our test data set and it makes no impact on the performance.

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #25740498

    Author here. Having written a lot of Haskell, I don't find lazy evaluation to be an issue nearly as often as it is a benefit. Yes, it can be difficult to reason about at times, but…

  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #23643879

    I don't think it's holding SPAs to a higher standard. It's holding SPAs to a reasonable expectation for SPAs. An SPA is significantly more complicated on the client side in exchang…