Viewing profile — chank
chank
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 07, 2012, 8:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 866
- Public activity
- 230 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chank
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48786013
Until somebody comes along and uses it for that. Fun toy turns into decision making tool that the creator never intended. Maybe nothing will come of it. That's just my unfiltered o…
-
comment
Comment #48781808
It means prices will go up and service/quality will go down. I already consider the service sort of at a base state. If it gets any worse, it will just go under. Which is what they…
-
comment
Comment #48781498
Questionable ranking algo. Easily hacked. We shouldn't and don't really need to "gamify" GitHub stats as it's likely extremely unhealthy.
-
comment
Comment #48236125
Wasn't really trying to take the socialist view. Merely stating what usually happens. Grow the business usually means make more money in the easiest way possible (cost cutting usua…
-
comment
Comment #48235577
Capitalists usually recoup gains rather than re-investing in people or working in new verticals. This gels with companies who would rather do anything else than grow.
-
comment
Comment #46092189
And Americans leave because employers will just replace them with offshoring and h1bs to save money. It's a self perpetuating cycle. Loyalty goes both ways. Employees finally reali…
-
comment
Comment #44774373
> https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/hooks > https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents
-
comment
Comment #44638478
> In 2025, social media has moved from self-expression to self-entrapment I sort of feel if you're only figuring this out now you've been willfully/woefully ignorant.
-
comment
Comment #44103479
How are we not full circle back to the early 00's with this design? It didn't really catch on then. Maybe this time? Wasn't a big fan of it then. Still not.
-
comment
Comment #43561715
The point is, supplements will mostly only help you shore up deficiencies in your diet and generally won't do it as effectively as eating right. No matter how much supplementation …
-
comment
Comment #43560511
Honestly, likely not that much. From what I've found you can get recommended dosage and more from just eating the right foods. Right meaning foods rich in what you're looking for. …
-
comment
Comment #43558021
The meaningfull context here was "good diet". If middle distance runners ate for middle distance running would they need to take beta alanine? E.g. ate more organ meat which contai…
-
comment
Comment #43557985
I don't want to be rude, but your off-topic anecdote about my uninteresting and useless anecdote is also... uninteresting and useless.
-
comment
Comment #43556531
Over the years through my own involvement in sports and physically demaning jobs with trying a lot of different supplementation, I've come to the conclusion that most (if not all) …
-
comment
Comment #43533984
I would say not really. This pretty much only fits the exact use case for its specific niche need. E.g. operating in RF adverse/non-recoverable environments. Otherwise it's a waste…
-
comment
Comment #43113824
Because they already have something that works. Why switch if theres no advantage.
-
comment
Comment #43048060
Salient point, the US is the only American country with America in it's actual name. Names of things change. It's how language works. Even though I think Gulf of America is actuall…
-
comment
Comment #41449970
I think those two in particular might be poor examples, since they generally do quite a bit of de-branding on their products. I know what you mean however. Supreme is a prime brand…
-
comment
Comment #41445540
It's actually a perfect analogy, IMO. Tattoo, is a form of (typically chosen) self-branding. A lot of companies make great products and then deminish them by thier mis/use of brand…
-
comment
Comment #41125848
Edgar Friendly said it best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjoSQ-lCA58
-
comment
Comment #41125804
Nah. Stop taking everything you read on the internet so literally.
-
comment
Comment #41105247
They definitly can be. That's the slope. Where do you stop. Any totalitarian worth thier salt can easily make that leap. Use monitoring to curb one type of crime and "undesirable" …
-
comment
Comment #41105217
Do they really stop you at gun-point to get you to pull over? Didn't think so. Of course police are armed. You're taking the comment to literally.
-
comment
Comment #41105211
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #41103705
> Enforcing traffic laws is good, actually. Automated enforcement is even better so that we don't need to use armed police and can enforce consistently. We don't use armed police t…