Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cgdl

cgdl

HN member
Joined
Mon, Dec 30, 2024, 11:57 PM UTC
HN karma
104
Public activity
17 items

About cgdl

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #44903234

    Very cool. For the INT4 QAT model, what is the recommended precision for the activations and for the key and values stored in KV cache?

  4. comment
    Comment #44768683

    Which model does the demo use?

  5. comment
    Comment #44662868

    I'd say llm inference requires both memory capacity and bandwidth. Cerebras provides bandwidth with on-chip SRAM, but not capacity (an entire wafer has only 44GB SRAM).

  6. comment
    Comment #44662847

    Indeed, and even if the cost per wafer was 300K, since about say 20-50 wafers are needed, its still 6MM to 15MM for the system. So likely it would appear this is VC subsidized.

  7. comment
    Comment #44662514

    Do you distinguish betwen "chips" and the wafer-scale system? Is the wafer-scale system significantly less than 3MM? EDIT: online it seems TSMC prices are about 25K-30K per wafer. …

  8. comment
    Comment #44662486

    Exactly what I was thinking. What sort of latency do you think one would get with 8x B200 Blackwell chips? Do you think 1500 tokens/sec would be achievable in that setup?

  9. comment
    Comment #44565649

    Do we know how far this event was from earth? Wouldn't that distance be the determiner of what the relative contraction observed on earth would be?

  10. comment
    Comment #43558699

    I recently came across a critique of the Turing test that seems relevant here. Given the test's limited duration (five minutes in this study) and the constrained rate of human comm…

  11. comment
    Comment #43507603

    Thank you for the great discussion. You've put your finger on the right thing I think. We can now dispense with the old VC-type thinking (i.e., that it's because the hypothesis spa…

  12. comment
    Comment #43507225

    Thank you, this makes sense. I am thinking of this as an abstraction/refinement process where an abstract notion of the longer completion is refined into a cogent whole that satisf…

  13. comment
    Comment #43497578

    Thank you. In my mind, "planning" doesn’t necessarily imply higher-order reasoning but rather some form of search, ideally with backtracking. Of course, architecturally, we know th…

  14. comment
    Comment #43408283

    Yes, and that's the problem. What Zhang et al [2] showed convincingly in the Rethinking paper is that just focusing on the hypothesis space cannot be enough since the same hypothes…

  15. comment
    Comment #43390712

    Agreed, but PAC-Bayes or other descendants of VC theory is probably not the best explanation. The notion of algorithmic stability provides a (much) more compelling explanation. See…

  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #42554989

    Very interesting. A related paper from a couple of years ago proposed a similar idea to understand generalization in deep learning: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10036